- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 49,626
- Reaction score
- 28,336
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm going to get in trouble for this but in terms of playmaking, he has flashed Law/Samuel ability. In his year with Romeo he had 6 INT; that would tie Law and Samuel for their second best years, they've each had a 10 INT year and their next best is 6. Bodden hasn't shown he can do it in big games but he's ****y (good for a CB) and has shown the ability. If we can get some pass rush I think he can be the 3rd best playmaking (read : INT) CB since Belichick got here behind Law and Samuel and being closer to those two that you might think.ps : Is there anyone out there who would be comparable to Bodden ? For instance, would he be similar in production (maybe not style of play) as Tyrone Poole in his better years or could we expect more ? I am not too familiar with Bodden other than the 2 or 3 posts about him...
Wish it had been a longer term contract
Either he will be good or he will suck.
If he sucks we wasted our money.
If he is good, he will command more money that we will pay and he will be gone.
Why not a contract with a big second year in case he is really good?
I'm going to get in trouble for this but in terms of playmaking, he has flashed Law/Samuel ability. In his year with Romeo he had 6 INT; that would tie Law and Samuel for their second best years, they've each had a 10 INT year and their next best is 6. Bodden hasn't shown he can do it in big games but he's ****y (good for a CB) and has shown the ability. If we can get some pass rush I think he can be the 3rd best playmaking (read : INT) CB since Belichick got here behind Law and Samuel and being closer to those two that you might think.
I wasn't really trying to compare him to Law, just pointing out that Law only had one season with more INT than Bodden had in 2007. You are 100% correct that doing it in Cleveland it VERY different from doing it in a playoff game; but there is significant reason for hope with him.I'd be skeptical about Law comparisons. Like I said, I have little to go on, but I remember Law in the snow beating Manning on several occasions... Bodden gonna do that ?
Ok. I hear what everyone is saying... but how do we explain the contracts for Eugene Wilson ([email protected]) or Foxworth (is it 4@28 ?) and then we get this guy (who should be in his prime) for the minimum ? Yes, he is looking for a huge payday, but would he refuse Eugene Wilson money ?
It just sounds weird - but I know BB's found some cheap deals and turned them into gold before (is that Earthwind Moreland I see out there ?).
I figured that when Bodden signed an one year deal, it had a lot to do with his choice. If he rebounds his career this season, he is set to make a killing next offseason with no salary cap whether it is with the Pats or someone else.
Rob sums it up pretty well in his post.
They likely couldnt agree to terms, so bodden chose to sign a one year "prove deal", with the hopes of cashing in big next season. I have no beef with that. The Pats wont make the Asante mistake twice. If Bodden plays at a very high level this season, im guessing they will lock him up before he hits the market.
I wouldn't be so sure about that.
you call asante a 'mistake', but how does he fit on this team right now at the money he's making?
where's the precedent for bb making a corner top 3 in salary?
they've already got 2 young corners in the pipe, and probably draft another this year.
I'd tend to agree here... BB seems to be willing to go a year of big money (Asante, Law) but not long-term. I understand Bodden looking for big bucks after what he hopes will be a solid year in NE. But I think Foxworth money is quite impressive... is he really looking for more ? And if he's borderline Asante (as mentionned, though I did read the poster's warning that he was making the comparison with certain reservations) it's seems he'd a attractive on the market.
Don't get me wrong : I am ALL for the signing. He's young, he's played in a similar system, he's mega-cheap... I'm just trying to get the angle. No way that you play a game as risky as football for a 1-year minimum contract if someone is offering 3 at 11 million - what E.Wilson is getting... Something just doesn't sound right : either he's not as promising as some hope or he might be a bit overrated, or his agent likes to play chicken. I might be naive, but playmakers get bucks.
we finally have some tall corners that are hopefully good
Ok. I hear what everyone is saying... but how do we explain the contracts for Eugene Wilson ([email protected]) or Foxworth (is it 4@28 ?) and then we get this guy (who should be in his prime) for the minimum ? Yes, he is looking for a huge payday, but would he refuse Eugene Wilson money ?
It just sounds weird - but I know BB's found some cheap deals and turned them into gold before (is that Earthwind Moreland I see out there ?).
I'd tend to agree here... BB seems to be willing to go a year of big money (Asante, Law) but not long-term. I understand Bodden looking for big bucks after what he hopes will be a solid year in NE. But I think Foxworth money is quite impressive... is he really looking for more ? And if he's borderline Asante (as mentionned, though I did read the poster's warning that he was making the comparison with certain reservations) it's seems he'd a attractive on the market.
Don't get me wrong : I am ALL for the signing. He's young, he's played in a similar system, he's mega-cheap... I'm just trying to get the angle. No way that you play a game as risky as football for a 1-year minimum contract if someone is offering 3 at 11 million - what E.Wilson is getting... Something just doesn't sound right : either he's not as promising as some hope or he might be a bit overrated, or his agent likes to play chicken. I might be naive, but playmakers get bucks.