- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,724
- Reaction score
- 16,525
It seems that we have a projected set of starters, if we can expect Kaczur to start at RG.
Dante's graduates are then the backups (two of Connolly, Wendell and Ohrnberger), with the possibility of replacing one with a C/OG, either from free agency or the draft (e.g Pouncy at 42).
That also leaves us with an option of adding a developmental OT, but wouldn't it be more likely that Belichick would simply wait until 2011 and draft a starter?
I would like to choose between a 2nd round C/OG and a 2nd round OT, rather than this year's equivalent of Ohrnberger and Bussey. Let's be clear. Belichick did draft an OT, a developmental OG and a developmental OT last year.
I don't think that we SHOULD use two of our top five picks on OL's. Do you think that we should do so?
I apolgize if you are talking about 6th and 7th rounders as developmental linemen. If so, I care little about these picks, other than the fact that Belichick does well.
Dante's graduates are then the backups (two of Connolly, Wendell and Ohrnberger), with the possibility of replacing one with a C/OG, either from free agency or the draft (e.g Pouncy at 42).
That also leaves us with an option of adding a developmental OT, but wouldn't it be more likely that Belichick would simply wait until 2011 and draft a starter?
I would like to choose between a 2nd round C/OG and a 2nd round OT, rather than this year's equivalent of Ohrnberger and Bussey. Let's be clear. Belichick did draft an OT, a developmental OG and a developmental OT last year.
I don't think that we SHOULD use two of our top five picks on OL's. Do you think that we should do so?
I apolgize if you are talking about 6th and 7th rounders as developmental linemen. If so, I care little about these picks, other than the fact that Belichick does well.
If Kaczur moves to starting RG, then I have absolutely no problem with his salary being commensurate with his role, BTW.