mackenzie45220
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2012
- Messages
- 516
- Reaction score
- 2
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I just finished that article about the importance of the nickel defense
Why the front 7 is overrated in the NFL - NFL Mocks - 2013 NFL Mock Draft, Fantasy Football, NFL News, and NFL Mock Draft Databases
Thanks for the link, I'll have a look.
What do you think of our draft? What would you have done different?
I just feel like teams put more emphasis on that base defense then their nickel package. You don't see teams with their nickel package one the field more than their front 7 in practice. Many teams seem a bit disorganized with their nickel, playing a variety of guys at nickelback in the game because they don't bother to have a number one nickelback out of camp. Smart teams only sub in one nickelback (49ers and Chris Culliver. Actually, when Culliver was on the field, they often moved Carlos Rodgers to the slot, but still, their third defensive back is a very clearly defined player), and do not rotate. Other teams are pretty random about who they sub in (and out, from the front 7) when they go to the nickel. The 4-2-5 or the 3-3-5 should be treated like a base defense. That's all I'm sayingIt's hardly a Deep, Dark Secret that Defenses are migrating to what I've called "65" Formations at the expense of classical "74" Formations. This has been going on for Years.
The "65" Formations ~ the "425", the "335", and, my favorite, the "245" ~ are clearly on the rise and ~ as I predicted, last Summer, and repeat, here ~ I believe will become Base Defenses in the not too distant Future.
I don't know why you're shocked at the continued reference to classical "74" Formations like the "34" and "43". All Defenses need a Foundation to build on ~ a point of Reference, you see: a "Language" to build understanding with. And these are obviously the two most popular "Base" Defenses.
Also, Jonathan Brown is a good player on a bad team. I promise you, he's Lavonte David. Elite instincts and toughness, and he's a pretty good athlete.
I just feel like teams put more emphasis on that base defense then their nickel package. You don't see teams with their nickel package one the field more than their front 7 in practice. Many teams seem a bit disorganized with their nickel, playing a variety of guys at nickelback in the game because they don't bother to have a number one nickelback out of camp. Smart teams only sub in one nickelback (49ers and Chris Culliver. Actually, when Culliver was on the field, they often moved Carlos Rodgers to the slot, but still, their third defensive back is a very clearly defined player), and do not rotate. Other teams are pretty random about who they sub in (and out, from the front 7) when they go to the nickel. The 4-2-5 or the 3-3-5 should be treated like a base defense. That's all I'm saying
Ummm, Jacques Washington looks extremely underrated.
This process is officially complete. And I end it with one measurables + stats high sleeper probability candidate, Jonathan Dowling, a safety dismissed by Florida who has made a home for himself at Western Kentucky, getting 68 tackles and 6 picks there last season. Not to mention, 6'2, 198, 4.52 40I'm at the stage every year where I'm not actually scouting, but simply deciding who to scout. Finding the guys I'm going to be watching over the next couple of months.