JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,428
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I really like his answers. I don't care how he delivers them, I don't get what people don't like about him. He answers what he can (informatively) and doesn't what he can't.
That said, I think he answered the 5 RB's question for us. Anyone else think so?
For those of us who can't/didn't hear, how did he answer it?
Oh, it's on their site, but basically someone asked about the RB's starting with "since it's unlikely you're going to carry five RB's..."
He basically answered by talking about the backs and saying a lot about how keeping the best players is more likely than keeping a balanced roster and that it will probably be unbalanced. That sounds like a yes to 5 RB's to me. An unexpected (to me) comment on BJGE makes me wonder if it won't be the 5 we think it will, though...
I think with the release of Pollard opens the door for 5 RBs on the roster - I don't think DeVree makes it unles he goes on the PS and thats where I expect him to land.
We go with 2 TEs and 5 RBs
And O'Connell because it's the last time he'll see an NFL field for 11 months.
Personally, I'm hoping for a fair amount of O'Connell garbage time.