patsfan-1982
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,756
- Reaction score
- 274
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Id say he's #3 as irreplaceable. Gronk at #2
I'm more confused now.
I jumped in when you said 10 mill of cap space was enough to sign Revis, but you are saying he can't get market value?
16/16/16 is better than 10/19/19
Picking up the 20 is better than 10/19/19 if he wants 40 of it guaranteed.
What are you willing to pay?
Definitely debatable, I was thinking of Gronk as well, but went with Revis as number two because of the importance of the passing game and his ability to just take someone out of the game.
No. If it comes down to Cromartie, spend the money on a different position and stick with what we have. He is awful.
I was thinking of Revis as #2, but because of the importance of the passing game and his ability to change the nature of the offense, I chose Gronk.
Yes. Thats what I am saying. Cramming down the first year doesn't look like a good move to me. Not given the parameters it seems Revis would agree to.Doesn't that still require them to cut 4.5 million off the cap this year?
Besides his rookie year every season that Gronk has played in all the games the Pats have made the Superbowl I know it's a small sample size, but it is clear how valuable Gronk is to the team.I was thinking of Revis as #2, but because of the importance of the passing game and his ability to change the nature of the offense, I chose Gronk.
Actually the Anti-Browner, which is the opposite of a complementSigning Cromartie would be getting Browner at higher cost and zero ability to hit......tackle.......or make contact.
Pass
I'd prefer a 3 year deal. Why would you pay the 34 year old Revis like the 29 year old Revis.You first!
===========
Seriously, I've said 5/$70M for quite some time. I'd be surprised if surprised if Belichick's offer was more than that. Obviously, Belichick can move up a bit at the last minute, as he did for McCourty.
For me, a 3-year deal has always been a non-starter.
Besides one, every play Lincoln attended was awesome.Besides his rookie year every season that Gronk has played in all the games the Pats have made the Superbowl I know it's a small sample size, but it is clear how valuable Gronk is to the team.
a bunch of crapIf he's really looking for 16 a year what was all that bs about not having to be the highest paid corner in the NFL?
a bunch of crap
It's Revis, so losing him over the difference between 14 mill and 16 mill is dumb.
Ya gronk HAS to be #2 IMOI was thinking of Revis as #2, but because of the importance of the passing game and his ability to change the nature of the offense, I chose Gronk.