twnickels2014
Rookie
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
For the last couple of days, I took some time to look back at the live chat/analysis on ESPN Boston and the Boston Globe for that game (since I can’t access the game on the Internet for free).
It looks like Tom Brady had a total of 4.5 bad throws in the game. The .5, if you're wondering, was for the Slater incompletion. While the ball was slightly underthrown on that play (Slater gained a little separation, but definitely wasn't wide open), I saw it being more of a bad decision by Brady on that play (he should've thrown to Amendola underneath on third-and-3, which would've guaranteed a first down). I also partially blame Josh McDaniels' play-calling on that play (why is Matthew Slater the go-to receiver on 3rd down? Also, that's a pretty low-percentage option). Of the other 4 bad throws, 2 were intended for Edelman: the infamous one in the first quarter, and 1 in the fourth quarter (which came on the Patriots' first touchdown drive). Another bad throw was intended for Vereen (it also came on the Patriots' first touchdown drive). The last bad throw, of course, was to Collie right before the end of the half (which prevented a last-second field goal).
Overall, of all those bad plays, I feel like the Edelman overthrow in the first quarter was the only one that actually had a good chance of being a game-changer. Had Brady made that throw, that's a touchdown. I don't see the Collie overthrow as much of a game-changer, because the Patriots would still have been down 13-6 at halftime, and the Broncos were already dominating the Patriots in every phase of game.
I thought that some analysts after the game (such as Mike Reiss, Tom Curran, and Mike Greenberg) were too overcritical of Brady’s performance (Curran said that Brady played like Blaine Gabbert, which is completely false; Greenberg said he was “lousy regardless,” which is BS as well). Overall—in my opinion—Brady’s performance wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. “Mediocre” is probably the best classification.
I think Brady played better than some people are giving him credit for.
It looks like Tom Brady had a total of 4.5 bad throws in the game. The .5, if you're wondering, was for the Slater incompletion. While the ball was slightly underthrown on that play (Slater gained a little separation, but definitely wasn't wide open), I saw it being more of a bad decision by Brady on that play (he should've thrown to Amendola underneath on third-and-3, which would've guaranteed a first down). I also partially blame Josh McDaniels' play-calling on that play (why is Matthew Slater the go-to receiver on 3rd down? Also, that's a pretty low-percentage option). Of the other 4 bad throws, 2 were intended for Edelman: the infamous one in the first quarter, and 1 in the fourth quarter (which came on the Patriots' first touchdown drive). Another bad throw was intended for Vereen (it also came on the Patriots' first touchdown drive). The last bad throw, of course, was to Collie right before the end of the half (which prevented a last-second field goal).
Overall, of all those bad plays, I feel like the Edelman overthrow in the first quarter was the only one that actually had a good chance of being a game-changer. Had Brady made that throw, that's a touchdown. I don't see the Collie overthrow as much of a game-changer, because the Patriots would still have been down 13-6 at halftime, and the Broncos were already dominating the Patriots in every phase of game.
I thought that some analysts after the game (such as Mike Reiss, Tom Curran, and Mike Greenberg) were too overcritical of Brady’s performance (Curran said that Brady played like Blaine Gabbert, which is completely false; Greenberg said he was “lousy regardless,” which is BS as well). Overall—in my opinion—Brady’s performance wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. “Mediocre” is probably the best classification.
I think Brady played better than some people are giving him credit for.