- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
I'd say not.
Let me clarify something for you.
I have criticized CJ's non-performance, 'lack of contribution to this team', not his character.
You however have posted in rebuttal numerous personal attacks against the poster for posting an opinion that you somehow can not tolerate. That behaviour on your part is supposed to be a no-no here. Me, I don't care. It's just a football forum.
Some quotes:
I'll stipulate that Chad MAY be blocking well on runs although you Chad folks know that you have no evidence as of yet to support that contribution.
Hey, maybe he should be moved to TE?
The head coach qualifies as evidence, I think you'll agree. Go review what he said about the play selection when Chad was in the game.
It's obvious that like with Gabriel, Tom Brady wastes no valuable seconds in the pocket searching for whatever sector of the galaxy Chad Jackson has cluelessly wandered into. Sad, given the lack of talent in the veteran wideout competition in this year's squad. All size, speed and physique, but not a player above the neck.
Not attacking his character, but calling him clueless here without offering any sort of evidence. Again, the coach noted that most of the plays he was in for were running plays.
What perverse possibly sexual attraction does this consistent non-contributor have to fans of the Forum?
You seriously think that this is acceptable but that Pony Express is out of line? Sling arrows all you want, heck it can be half the fun, but quit crying when people sling them back at you.