- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,905
- Reaction score
- 33,918
Wait, are you serious? Did you really think it would be in favor of the 2x loser, or was that just sarcasm?
Usually a team defeats an opponent both times in the regular season because they are the BETTER TEAM. As the better team, they should be EXPECTED (not lucky) to win the third game.
I hate it when announcers say..."it's tough to beat a team three times in one season". Yes, it is. I agree. IF you knew the Pats would play a team three times in one season and you had to predict the the liklihood of a Pats sweep, you may say about 75% (arbitrary number). But, if that changes to....what are the Pats chances of a three games sweep GIVEN that they have already won the first two, well, now you are talking about a much greater percentage. The two scenarios are drastically different but most analysts fail to realize this.
If two teams play three times, it means that both were good enough to get to the playoffs. So thinking the team who lost the first two meetings wins the third more times than not is not that much of a crazy idea.











