Claremonster
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 2,213
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
There isn't a single team in the NFL that wouldn't be screwed if their starting QB went down.
I disagree...how could the Jets be any worse WITHOUT Buffumblechez starting games?
Not exactly stunning...both of them.
TFB better not go down.
I thought Mallett was supposed to be so good?
I already know about Teblow...
There isn't a single team in the NFL that wouldn't be screwed if their starting QB went down.
I thought Mallett was supposed to be so good?
.
Not exactly stunning...both of them.
TFB better not go down.
I thought Mallett was supposed to be so good?
I already know about Teblow...
Serious question. He clearly can't and likely never will be able to run this team's offense. The offense relies on precision, timing, accuracy, decision making etc., things that Tebow clearly lacks. You say you want to run the Wildcat or Spread offense, that of course, means Brady sits.
Wouldn't this team be better served developing a "real" QB instead of trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Are they just going to throw away the playbook they spent over a decade developing to play sandlot football when /if Tebow plays.
To me, it just doesn't make sense on any level. Can someone enlighten me, without the usual "he's a great person" BS?
Well, I would hazard a guess that they think he is better than Kakfa, our previous QB3.
Why this mystifies people is beyond me.
Well, I would hazard a guess that they think he is better than Kakfa, our previous QB3.
Why this mystifies people is beyond me.