FCB02062
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,191
- Reaction score
- 12,656
Amanda Belichick and Mrs Jastremski, diversity splicedNeed two Diverse interviewees beforehand.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Amanda Belichick and Mrs Jastremski, diversity splicedNeed two Diverse interviewees beforehand.
That would be interesting.
I was wondering this could somebody explain the real differences between the offensive philosophies.
Todays NFL is mostly a air it out game, so what would changing the offensive philosophy or combining principles from 2 different offenses what pros and or cons could that create?
Was me and depending on who our OC is I'm a bit disappointed we can't grab Pep.Someone here mentioned Pep Hamilton as an OC possibility, Just saw on NFL network ticker that he’s staying on with the Texans as their OC.
With as young as Mac and is and there not being a grizzled offensive player would a change of philosophy, terminology be a major hurdle?The differences can be significant. Terminology, for instance, is like learning a foreign language and is the thread running through everything. And unlike a lot of teams the Pats run a precision timing-based passing offense that even an experienced OC like Bienemy might not know. New England's system hasn't changed during BB's tenure so that's why they keep talking about either elevating someone in-house or bringing in a coach with working knowledge of what they do.
Perhaps, it doesn’t. Alabama is a much safer bet for O’Brien. What does it do for future HC options if he came to the Pats and Jones regressed? That risk is not there at Alabama as the players are often worlds better than the opposition.No thanks. Doesn’t know the system and he would only be using the job as a steppingstone for a head coaching job, ASAP.
He’s kind of an arrogant dink but O’Brien is clearly the best option IF Bill can get him to commit to at least two seasons as OC before considering head coaching positions. He’d obviously be asked to run the Patriots system I could also bring elements of the Alabama offense.
From O’Brien’s standpoint, if he wants to be an NFL head coach again, the Patriots OC job makes much more sense than remaining in Alabama. If Alabama has a great season on offense next year and/or the year after, many NFL teams may just chalk that up to superior talent, vs. helping Mac take his game to another level.
That would be the absolute worst thing you could to the offense.With as young as Mac and is and there not being a grizzled offensive player would a change of philosophy, terminology be a major hurdle?
Or is BB just married to the air Coryell offense?
So now you make things up to create something to argue against? There is nothing in that laundry list that I ever said, and I said nothing to diminish Mayo in any way.Why the heck would I apologize? You've said a bunch of things in the last week, I have you clearly pinned. It's obvious how you come to your conclusions on these coaches.
Of all the BS in this thread about Mayo's credentials, you guys take the cake. From claims of the guy never playing special teams, to Vrabel having it over him because he played TE a couple times, to grad assistant years counting more than Mayo's playing years, the extraordinary lengths you go to to diminish Mayo's experience, the conclusion is obvious.
If Bienemy has experience in a Earnhardt / Perkins system, then he'd have no issue learning the terminology here. That's what DEFINES the E/P system.The differences can be significant. Terminology, for instance, is like learning a foreign language and is the thread running through everything. And unlike a lot of teams the Pats run a precision timing-based passing offense that even an experienced OC like Bienemy might not know. New England's system hasn't changed during BB's tenure so that's why they keep talking about either elevating someone in-house or bringing in a coach with working knowledge of what they do.
That would be the absolute worst thing you could to the offense.
It took all season for Mac to learn it, not to mention just adapting to the speed,talent and complexity of nfl defenses.
Hes now got an offseason where he can focus on getting stronger and improving mechanics. Not to mention continuing to develop chemistry with his receivers.
He'll be able to play faster,make quicker and better decisions and find the open man better this year since he won't have to think as much. If you change the offense now,all that goes out the window and the Pats are almost back to square one. Not to mention Bourne Henry Myers et al were starting to get in synch with Mac- now they too have to learn a new offense.
Mac will play a little freer this year.
Don't f that up.
The biggest differences for a qb are the footwork/timing and the reads and progressions. You have to learn where to look, what you are seeing, and when to look for it.I was wondering this could somebody explain the real differences between the offensive philosophies.
Todays NFL is mostly a air it out game, so what would changing the offensive philosophy or combining principles from 2 different offenses what pros and or cons could that create?
If it’s internal it won’t be a promotion to OC, either Lombardi or Caleb will become QB coach and have the bulk of OC duties without the title.Curious how long we'll have to wait for any movement on the staff side. BB does take his time with these things. And, the longer it goes, the more I wonder if he'll just keep the internal chute going. But, if he puts it on Caley or Lombardi, we'll have some serious learning curve to overcome. Same with DC. the longer it goes, if Mayo stays, they've got to legitimize something for leadership.
Did I miss something? Is it looking like a "NO GO" for a Billy O.B. return???
| 1 | 292 |
| 160 | 14K |
| 21 | 4K |
| 8 | 463 |
| 6 | 459 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











