Water Boy
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- Messages
- 4,444
- Reaction score
- 3,575
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Athletic | Posted: 07/02 👁: 35 |
| Why the Patriots' risky signing of G Alijah Vera-Tucker could turn out to be a steal |
MassLive | Posted: 06/30 👁: 50 |
| Tom Brady rips into Raiders for ugly 2025 season, expects improvement in 2026 |
The Athletic | Posted: 06/30 👁: 104 |
| Harold Landry's injury has lingered. What does that mean for the Patriots in 2026? |
The Athletic | Posted: 06/30 👁: 23 |
| One outstanding question for every team as the NFL's summer break begins |
The Athletic | Posted: 06/30 👁: 20 |
| Paraguay's stunner vs. Germany is right up there with Brady-Belichick productions |
| Mack’s off season grind 13 Reactions | 07/02 at 12:01 am |
| July 2: Happy 55th Birthday to Troy Brown 5 Reactions | 07/02 at 8:44 am |
Steve Balestrieri
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| jmt57 | 9 posts | |
| mayoclinic | 8 posts | |
| Wozzy | 8 posts | |
| Ice_Ice_Brady | 6 posts | |
| Huckleberry1 | 6 posts |
Same here. Maye is likely more a higher-floor/lower ceiling guy, a safer choice. But I think we all remember the last time we uttered the high floor/low-ceiling thing about a QB pick (last name Jones). Daniels, on the other hand, may come on the scene, make a big splash, get everybody all giddy, then spend the rest of his three-year career bouncing on and off IR or pretending to care about learning to play in the pocket. That puts the choice in an equal balance in my mind. I chose Daniel, because ti would probably make for more fun next year or something, but if it's Maye, I would understand that decision as well.I still don't know if I'd rather have Daniels or Maye.
If they grade McCarthy and Nix equal to Maye, would have bigger problems regarding their evaluation process.I know the conventional wisdom is that they zero in on a guy and get him where they think they can. But what if they grade a lot of these guys relatively equally, like Maye, McCarthy, and Nix? In the past, we've seen teams trading down not for a specific guy but because they'll still have the option to get one of the guys they grade relatively the same. I'm not sure that applies to QBs, but it's a method of drafting I think is more common than fans think.
I wonder if there may be a similar situation with the 1st Rnd trade last year out of #14 to #17 to get Gonzo and... Ryland. It seemed they were gonna be happy with either Forbes or Gonzo.I know the conventional wisdom is that they zero in on a guy and get him where they think they can. But what if they grade a lot of these guys relatively equally, like Maye, McCarthy, and Nix? In the past, we've seen teams trading down not for a specific guy but because they'll still have the option to get one of the guys they grade relatively the same. I'm not sure that applies to QBs, but it's a method of drafting I think is more common than fans think.
Why? Penix will be there in the 20's. We can just trade up to get him. Get someone good with the 3rd (MHJ at best, Alt at worst) and then go up with the two if Penix is the guy.Trade back and get Penix.
| 28 | 1K |
| 75 | 4K |
| 24 | 987 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 17 - July 2 (Through 26yrs)











