- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,532
- Reaction score
- 17,907
You forgot about Adrian Phillips, who will be starting at safety and playing well.
Did our starting SS really get cut when I wasn't paying attention?
Opps. Adding him. MB.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You forgot about Adrian Phillips, who will be starting at safety and playing well.
Did our starting SS really get cut when I wasn't paying attention?
but the shiny hood ornament looks cool!
Maybe my special teams grade was a bit low. I'm willing to be talked into moving it up. My main issue with STs is we don't have a kicker I feel very confident in. Kicker to me is like the QB of the STs. When you don't have an elite one it's hard for me to give the unit an A. Maybe if they had a truly dynamic return game along with lots of blocked kicks I could see it. But without one of the best kickers in the NFL it's hard for me to put them in the A range. Maybe B+?
Yes, I am an admitedly tough grader, but for a reason. You can't give a grade higher than an A+. And I wouldn't want to give out an A+ and then need to give out an A++ when someone is clearly better.
you would only give our TE group an A if we have Henry Smith Asiasi Keene (basically two rookies) and Pitts?QB: D-
RB: B+ - would love to give this group an A but I worry about injuries here
WR: C only if Edelman is healthy
TE: B Draft a guy like Pitts and this turns into an A.
OL: B+
Defense:
DL: C+
LB: B-
Secondary: A-
ST: A-
Coaching: A-
I see a 9 win roster. I think the floor is higher than it was a month ago but I'm not seeing the upside yet without a QB.
A dynamic return game . . . like an all pro punt returner?
We had THREE all pros on ST last year, Folk was solid if not spectacular, our coverage units rarely gave up big plays, we scored a few ST touchdowns, and several respected publications listed our STs as #1 in the league. I'm honestly not sure how that doesn't deserve at least an A.
OT / Dad-joke mode - would someone getting a scholarship to learn the art of evaluating a roster be a Rhodes Grader?Bob, I know giving grades is very subjective and I respect your opinion, but if you're giving our special teams unit which is the best in the league a B.....wow, you're a tough grader!!!! Also think if our Tight end position, O-line, RB's are less than an A....again tough grader.
I'd say 10 wins. They got 7 last year; they improved immensely at TE and a fair bit at WR; their D is better and their schedule is easier. There's also an extra game which I think is winnable. I'd say:
Wins:
Home: Dolphins, Jets, Jaguars, Saints
Away: Jets, Texans, Colts, Panthers, Chargers
TBD: Cowboys
Losses:
Home: Bills, Titans, Buccaneers, Browns
Away: Bills, Dolphins, Falcons
I could certainly see an argument for a few either way. If they add someone like Garoppolo I'd probably bump this up to 11 or even 12 wins (assuming he's healthy most games). Probably adds wins against teams like the Falcons, Browns and maybe the Bills once.
You don't want to end up over paying for a WR. But in today's game their value has gone up.
Unless you're an elite defensive team or have Brady it's hard to make the final 4 without sensational pass catchers recently.
And the question is who do we cut so we can afford to pay WR1 money.We have a legit WRs. We do not have an elite one. The question is is having an elite one mandatory when we already have 2 Pro-Bowl -potential TEs.
No oneInteresting line of reasoning from a recent podcast that I'll apply to Cam:
Was Cam good enough last year to lift the team around him? No.
Was the team around Cam good enough to lift him? No.
At least we made huge strides on one of those two problems.
And the question is who do we cut so we can afford to pay WR1 money.
I think your grade of D+ for WR's is a bit harsh. I'd lean more toward a B- or C+There are still a few moves they can do, but they look mostly ready right now hrading onto the draft. Here are my grades.
Offense.
QB: Cam/tbd - I think Cam wasn't as bad as some say he was last year. The offense simply didn't have the skill players. That being said, he isn't good enough to take us where we want to go. Grade: D
OL: Brown Mason Andrews Onwenu Wynn back up IOL Karras, back up OT tbd. Overall a very good group with no weak spot. The only question is what happens if Brown or Wynn miss time? But back up OT bring your concern is a good spot. Grade: A-
RB: Harris, White, Michel, Vitals(FB). A very good and diverse group. About the next best thing you can have besides a true super star at the spot. High hopes for Harris. Grafe: B+
TE: Henry, Smith. I'm curious to see who'll be the 3rd TE, but not too curious. This is all about the top 2 guys. Id still rather have Little or Kelce over both next year. Outside of that it's questionable if there will be a team better off in that spot than us. Grade: A-
WR: Agholor, Bourne, Edelman, Meyers. Still not a strong point, but not horrible. If Edelman retires it will look a little worse. While they want have that clear cut number 1 option, they will be able to flood the field with decent targets and try to pick on the weak links. Grade: D+
Overall offensive grade: C (but with a better QB it improves a lot). The lack of a true #1 option hurt, but they can run, protect the QB, and give any D at least some match up issues with their 2 TE set.
DL Guy Godeaux Anderson Judon Wonovich Wise. There is still a lot to work out here, and another piece could be added on the outside imo. While Judon is called an OLB I think he'll mostly play DE for us. A good cast but one more star player would put them over the top. Grade: B
LB: Hightower Van Noy Bentley - A big strength of the team. Grade A-
CB: Gilmore Jackson Jones Williams. I'll assume for now Jackson is staying. I do still hope McCourty comes back. Even without him this group is arguably the best in the NFL. Grade: A
S: McCourty Mills Phillips Dugger. A group that should have a very good top 2. And I like Dugger. Grade B+ (Edit, forgot about Phillips the first time... D'oh!)
Overall Defensive grade: B+ This defense is really more than the sum of it's parts. The only issue it has is that without a 5 man rush I don't see how they reliably get pressure. They have the coverage to pull it off against most teams. Bit against a team with the skill position depth to beat man, they can be had a bit. Not to mention they aren't reallt built to stop TEs or RBs. But you rarely have everything. Overall this D is clearly Championship caliber.
STs Grade: B I'm not getting into this much. Kicker is still a position I wish we were better in. But I like everything else well enough.
Overall Grade: B- right now we look like a typical mid tier WC playoff team. Our coaching advantage is nice. It would be nice to say we're a QB away, but I think we are are kust a tad more than a QB away. Very close though.
Here's a prediction. The WR will VERY soon become the future's version of the RB. That is, easy to find them and with so many out there you won't have to pay them the amounts of money that too many receive today. Sure there will be a few that will get big money, but not like they are getting in todays game. Why? Simply put, "Economics"You don't want to end up over paying for a WR. But in today's game their value has gone up.
Unless you're an elite defensive team or have Brady it's hard to make the final 4 without sensational pass catchers recently.
QB: B- cam is underrated
Here's a prediction. The WR will VERY soon become the future's version of the RB. That is, easy to find them and with so many out there you won't have to pay them the amounts of money that too many receive today. Sure there will be a few that will get big money, but not like they are getting in todays game. Why? Simply put, "Economics"
In today's pass happy offenses the College game is spewing out 20 odd NFL quality receivers every year. Sure some are better than others but most are good enough to win with......and in the end, THAT is what matters. In a day in the not too distant future, FA WR's will start to see the premium contract start to dry out when the market gets stuffed with quality guys. More guys than there are jobs to have. AND next year there will be another 20, and the next and the next and the next. Get the picture.
DISCLAIMER - When I say these guys won't get paid, I'm speaking in relative terms here. There will be a bunch of guys with 10MM deals, but even as the cap rises, there will be very few if any, 20MM/yr deals.
| 115 | 6K |
| 118 | 5K |
| 264 | 20K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











