Whatever the Pats decided about Welker, they seem to have decided it in earnest. His deal out of all of them seems most designed to leave them on the hook all 5 years, at #3 money ($1.7M this year against the cap, big bonuses, smaller salaries; max of $4.5M against the cap in yr. 5.)
Everybody else seems to have an "audition year" in 07 (Stallworth, Moss, Washington.)
So, at his price, BB seems to think Welker is a "blue chip" addition. Quite possibly it's the versatility that brings him to that conclusion. It's not like we're Miami, and we have to use him as the go-to guy.
on 5'9" receivers - I'm pretty sure that's what Steve Smith is. QED.
On "woulda coulda shoulda" rear-view analysis: Didn't. End of story.
I was sad that Branch left. I am happy that the ragtag bunch that filled in did so well enough. I am very happy that the team is so stacked at present, and still $6.75M under the cap, with another $2.5M coming on 6/2, as "dead money" for Dillon's salary disappears. (Thanks to Miguel for his informative page, and as always, no reflection on same for any use I make of his #s.)
Finally, on what young Patriots such as Samuel see observing the Branch situation: They should see that when dealing with the Pats FO, you need to be sure your self-evaluation is realistic, and understand that it can be realistic from your own POV and that of another team, but may be in disagreement with the evaluation by the Foxboro brass. That's business. You may get to laugh about it (Vinatieri, for example, got what he wanted, plus a ring with the Colts,) or more likely, you will slip downward toward the hinterlands of the league. Make sure you factor that in.
Your replacements do just that.
PFnV