Don't get me wrong, the guys they have now are very good and effective, but I would like to see another WR here with the big play impact of Terry Glenn or Randy Moss. Yes we have that big play ability in our TE with Gronk, but to me you can never have enough weapons in your arsenal, and would just love to see that kind of impact wide receiver here. Do you guys see that happening at all at any point in the near future?
Teams don't win with that formula.
I would rather see a big impact OL, DL, LB, CB, etc.
Why do we need to overspend on exceptional WRs when we have Tom Brady making the ones we have part of the one of the most effective passing games and offenses in NFL history?
The Patriots have been in the top 82 of alltime in points scored (note that is the 82nd best of all time, in 75 years of the NFL) 6 times in the last 8 years.
2007 #2
2012 4
2010 11
2011 13
2014 38
2013 68
Furthermore, in the last 8 years, half of the Patriot offenses were in the top 13 of all time.
During that run, only 3 other teams had a season in the top 13, and each just one time.
In other words, in 4 of the last 8 seasons, the Patriot offense has scored 513 or more points.
In the entire history of the NFL before that only 7 franchises have done that and during the last 8 years the Patriots have done it 4 times and the entire rest of the league has done it 3 combined.
One of those seasons had a "big impact receiver". Why would we change that philosophy?
Conversely, show the SB champs who won because they broke the bank on a top flight WR.
I get that its cool to have those guys, and they make fun plays, but in a league where you have a salary cap, paying top $ to a WR has proven to not be the best strategy.
Look around the league, and name the 'big impact receivers' and count their rings.