How, for instance, could the NFL deny Brady the right to question Jeff Pash, the league's general counsel, "co-lead"/editor of the Wells Report and a critical potential witness?
"I don't understand," Berman said before blasting the NFL's reasoning that Goodell, as the arbitrator, decided that anything Pash would say would just be "cumulative" and thus not worth hearing.
"Under the law the arbitrator doesn't have the authority to determine evidence will be cumulative," Berman stated. "… How would you know [what Pash was going to testify]?"
How could the NFL attorneys use specific notes to cross-examine Brady but refuse to supply that information to Brady's attorneys when they requested it?
"There are standards of fairness," Berman said.