TinhWoodhead
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 5,734
- Reaction score
- 6,099
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It should've been translated.the whole set of videos of him talking plays with manning was so manning. Show off on film all the game planning talks about how he is the 'coach' on the field so more people talk about this.
And Bill told Welker that and he did not seem smart enough to figure that out.
I don't think it's fair to say Wes lost anything while he was in NE...he caught what 123 and 118 balls his last two years here so he was still producing at a high level. If he had been resigned in 2013 I can't see why they would still sign DA (or if they could have, cap wise), so whatever BB was thinking about Wes, we ended up with the right guy(s) in creating the JE/DA combo.I know it didn't feel like it at the time, but it was probably a win-win for both sides.
It felt like Welker lost a bit at the end of his Patriots career, and it was clear BB didn't mind moving on.
We got Danny, and Jules emerged as the true Welker replacement. We win a Super Bowl within 2 years, and 2 in 3 years.
Welker got his full $12M with the Broncos and another chance to win a Super Bowl. I'm not sure he would have seen the second year of his deal here, let alone the incentives.
I do wonder if BB would have brought back Jules still if we re-signed Welker. My guess is yes because Dola was the Welker replacement, and we still re-signed Edelman for peanuts.
I think the plan was to bring back Jules regardless the either/or was Wes or DAI know it didn't feel like it at the time, but it was probably a win-win for both sides.
It felt like Welker lost a bit at the end of his Patriots career, and it was clear BB didn't mind moving on.
We got Danny, and Jules emerged as the true Welker replacement. We win a Super Bowl within 2 years, and 2 in 3 years.
Welker got his full $12M with the Broncos and another chance to win a Super Bowl. I'm not sure he would have seen the second year of his deal here, let alone the incentives.
I do wonder if BB would have brought back Jules still if we re-signed Welker. My guess is yes because Dola was the Welker replacement, and we still re-signed Edelman for peanuts.
At the expense of his healthI know it didn't feel like it at the time, but it was probably a win-win for both sides.
It felt like Welker lost a bit at the end of his Patriots career, and it was clear BB didn't mind moving on.
We got Danny, and Jules emerged as the true Welker replacement. We win a Super Bowl within 2 years, and 2 in 3 years.
Welker got his full $12M with the Broncos.
I don't think it's fair to say Wes lost anything while he was in NE...he caught what 123 and 118 balls his last two years here so he was still producing at a high level. If he had been resigned in 2013 I can't see why they would still sign DA (or if they could have, cap wise), so whatever BB was thinking about Wes, we ended up with the right guy(s) in creating the JE/DA combo.
As it played out with the Hernandez situation that summer, and Gronk injury later in season, it sure would have been nice to have Wes on that 2013 team in addition to JE/DA, but I can't see a reason to plan that way in free agency time when those decisions were made.
I think the plan was to bring back Jules regardless the either/or was Wes or DA
At the expense of his health
| 18 | 2K |
| 18 | 2K |
| 13 | 847 |
| 7 | 955 |
| 8 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
August 4 - August 19 (Through 26yrs)











