VectorPrime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2010
- Messages
- 15,371
- Reaction score
- 20,380
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Huh?I think the Pats defense played well enough but the Bucs went back to scoring a lot of points since that game so BB didn’t solve them or anything.
Bill didn’t create a blueprint for solving that Tampa offense. If he did other teams would copy it and be successful.Huh?
Does Bill know he bares responsibility for other D coordinators failures against Tampa?
Wow switching from grass to turf in 25 minutes! Did I hear that right?
Cardinal rule of New England sports (radio): any bad results for the Pats must not be attributed to a well-executed play or great effort by the opponent, it's because the Pats suck.The Bucs only scoring 19 was not a “win“ for Bill either. I think the Pats defense played well enough but the Bucs went back to scoring a lot of points since that game so BB didn’t solve them or anything. It was just a weird night. I believe Brady wanted to kick the crap out of the Pats and the emotion and the moment of the night made him press a bit. It will not happen again. Pats have shown through 5 weeks they are a work in progress and they’re not ready to take on the big dogs of the league right now.
BB vs Tom has already been decided in a landslide and that game meant little in the overall picture. Brady‘s team won the SB and looks like they have a good chance to repeat. Bill’s team missed the playoffs with a losing season last year, and a better chance than not that the same will apply this year. Unless Mac makes a gigantic second year leap there’s a good chance Bill will never make .500 as a coach without Brady.
I said their defense played well enough. Nobody is saying the Pats sucked that night. Well maybe except for the decision to kick on 4th and 3, that sucked.Cardinal rule of New England sports (radio): any bad results for the Pats must not be attributed to a well-executed play or great effort by the opponent, it's because the Pats suck.
Any good results for the Pats must not be attributed to any good play by the Pats, it's because the opponent sucks or drops a pass or is too excited (good grief) or the weather, because the opponent can't play in inclement weather (good grief x 10).
Signed: Eeyore.
2-0 vs NEIf Tua doesn't show something .....
Not sure what Sarah Thomas was watching there that was a catch
Edit: And they missed the FG anyway lol.
If Miami decides he's the franchise based on being 2-0 against NE, that's their right I suppose.2-0 vs NE
Was just gonna say both the good and the bad type of Harris playThat was a very Damien Harris-like play in multiple ways. Shame the announcers just let their stupid rules analyst go on about a previous play the entire duration of that run.
| 264 | 14K |
| 286 | 10K |
| 269 | 18K |
| 10 | 460 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










