- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 18,519
- Reaction score
- 28,554
im not sure conference record was ever first in a tie breaker... division maybe, but not conferenceThese rules are terrible. It used to be conference record first. Now it’s a mess.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.im not sure conference record was ever first in a tie breaker... division maybe, but not conferenceThese rules are terrible. It used to be conference record first. Now it’s a mess.
because it doesn't fit his argument?
I was thinking of the same thing. He is just...
@MAC10 disagree all you want... doesnt make you right... the criteria list literally says Head to Head as the first tie breaker under 3 (or more) clubsbecause it doesn't fit his argument?
W-L percentage among the tie breaking teams is the rule. Shrug.It doesn't make sense that if all the teams in a 3 or 4 way tie did not participate in a H2H with one of the other teams for that team to get screwed.
im not sure conference record was ever first in a tie breaker... division maybe, but not conference
he's had a good start so far... but hes what, 12 games into his rookie season? little early to be measuring him for a gold jacket, no?Parsons will be an Hof
I think that changed in 2002… just in time for the Pats to lose that tiebreaker to the Jets and miss the playoffs. If it was the old way they would have made it.im not sure conference record was ever first in a tie breaker... division maybe, but not conference
huh? send that to rainmakerNFL.com | Official Site of the National Football League
The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.www.nfl.com
Raiders might just forfeit.Has CBS ever switched to a more competitive game at halftime?
He looks so good that i think sohe's had a good start so far... but hes what, 12 games into his rookie season? little early to be measuring him for a gold jacket, no?
when they went from 3 divisions to 4 divisions... still dont understand why conference record would have been the first tie breaker instead of divisionI think that changed in 2002… just in time for the Pats to lose that tiebreaker to the Jets and miss the playoffs. If it was the old way they would have made it.
I think they already did.Raiders might just forfeit.
Right.@MAC10 disagree all you want... doesnt make you right... the criteria list literally says Head to Head as the first tie breaker under 3 (or more) clubs
team a beats team b
team c beats team b
team b loses the tie breaker...
then its applied to team a and team c
Thank youRight.
Pats 1-0
Titans 1-1
Chiefs 0-1
Seems obvious to me who should win the tiebreaker here.
| 55 | 4K |
| 12 | 493 |
| 8 | 504 |
| 1K | 56K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











