Warning: contents could be upsetting

[Pats2000]

What exactly do you want? A list of WRs and TEs who have been FAs over the past 3-4 years, ones who were available for trade, or ones we could have drafted?

You seem not to be aware that Deebo Samuel was available when we drafted N'Keal Harry.... something tells me we wouldn't have traded Deebo for a conditional 7th rounder this past offseason.... hell there are SIX pro bowl WRs drafted after Harry from that year. You want me to list them, or do you know how to use google?

You going to b*tch about the Harry trade forever, or move on at some point?

 

[XLIX]

Back in the spring Cup of joe made a valiant effort at this same exact thing proclaiming we had the worst or near worst receivers in the league.

When Jakobi Meyer is your #1 pass catcher, that speaks very poorly for the group as a whole. But you go right along thinking everything is sunshine and roses for our pass catchers.....

 

[Pats2000]

Granted, the NE offense is not as bad as the talking heads imply, but things are not as great as we like to believe.

Fasten your seatbelts this flight is heading towards turbulence.

Since you van pretty much take anything Nick Wright says and ensure the exact opposite will happen. I'm feeling pretty good.

 

[XLIX]

I remember that. Joe took a beating.

Including TE/WR, we're middle of the pack, maybe slightly worse. 15-20 range. Not great but not Houston, Baltimore, Tennessee, Detroit etc

LOL!! Yeah!! We're better than Detroit!!! So that means everything is perfectly fine and dandy!!!!

 

[Bruins29]

What exactly do you want? A list of WRs and TEs who have been FAs over the past 3-4 years, ones who were available for trade, or ones we could have drafted?

You seem not to be aware that Deebo Samuel was available when we drafted N'Keal Harry.... something tells me we wouldn't have traded Deebo for a conditional 7th rounder this past offseason.... hell there are SIX pro bowl WRs drafted after Harry from that year. You want me to list them, or do you know how to use google?

And thats great and after all that, your statement (that the Pats have near the worst pass catchers) has been debunked by many posters here. Thats with who they had last year and with what they are fielding now (upgraded from last year when Mac wasnt even throwing the ball) it should be better than their mid-pack.

But you seem to think that they are now going to be a bottom 5 group because they were mid pack last year and got worse? Or because they "could" have drafted Deeboo? Which has nothing to do with it.

I can get any 8 year old to say the Pats pass catchers stink.

 

[Bruins29]

LOL!! Yeah!! We're better than Detroit!!! So that means everything is perfectly fine and dandy!!!!

Nice straw man. but I guess when you have nothing you have to resort to that.

 

[BradytoMosstoGronk]

Felt like this was a more appropriate title

 

[Bruins29]

When Jakobi Meyer is your #1 pass catcher, that speaks very poorly for the group as a whole. But you go right along thinking everything is sunshine and roses for our pass catchers.....

Another straw man. Nice.

If disagreeing with your stupid take means I think everything is sunshine and roses, then I guess you truly are lost.

 

[XLIX]

And thats great and after all that, your statement (that the Pats have near the worst pass catchers) has been debunked by many posters here.

I haven't seen a single poster debunk it. All I have seen is you acting like the matter is settled when that is not even remotely the case.

I can get any 8 year old to say the Pats pass catchers stink.

Well the typical 8 year old sure knows more about football than you do, so I will take that as a point in my favor....

 

[Pats2000]

I remember that. Joe took a beating.

Including TE/WR, we're middle of the pack, maybe slightly worse. 15-20 range. Not great but not Houston, Baltimore, Tennessee, Detroit etc

Mac left a lot of yards, points - out there last year so there's room to grow among the rec corp. Obviously as he goes, we go but this group could be better with better QB play.

They have a ceiling though and need that alpha WR1 like Thomas, Diggs, Jefferson etc. You look at it that way and it puts it in perspective. You bring one of those guys in and you don't even need more changes. Bourne/Meyers are perfect WR2/3 and Henry is a top ten ish TE.

I don't think they even need a clear WR1. As long as they have a couple of guys that can keep the defense honest and take the top off. Thornton the way he is playing in camp and Agholor was open a lot last year and Mac missed him deep. As he was keeping the offense close to short to mid range. Probably by instruction of the coaches.

This is definitely an offense that can be top 10 in the league in receiving.

 

[Bruins29]

I haven't seen a single poster debunk it. All I have seen is you acting like the matter is settled when that is not even remotely the case.

Well the typical 8 year old sure knows more about football than you do, so I will take that as a point in my favor....

You need all the points you can get incel

 

[Jim Beankie]

Thu (or really Week 1) can't get here fast enough to see who wins the never-ending battle of Team Negative Nancies versus Team Unicorns and Show Ponies.

 

[XLIX]

You need all the points you can get incel

LOL!! oh my, I really pissed you off, didn't I...?

To paraphrase you: Nice personal attack. but I guess when you have nothing you have to resort to that.

 

[sb1]

Reading Scar's comments today was reassuring. Let's see what happens.

 

[ashley]

This thread is close to getting shut down.

 

[Bruins29]

LOL!! oh my, I really pissed you off, didn't I...?

To paraphrase you: Nice personal attack. but I guess when you have nothing you have to resort to that.

Saying an 8 year old knows more about football than I do is not a personal attack? I guess we can add hypocrite to your list.

 

[XLIX]

Saying an 8 year old knows more about football than I do is not a personal attack? I guess we can add hypocrite to your list.

To paraphrase you: Nice personal attack. but I guess when you have nothing you have to resort to that.