so there would appear to be a lot of truth in the article. I suspect that the Pats will only be a fad as long as they win.
QUOTE]
I don't think so. For the Red Sox, 1967 and the Impossible Dream was the turning point after about fifteen years of being perennial losers. Since then they've have about 3 losing seasons and always were on the cusp of winning it all. The fans responded and you've had two generations of die hard fans.
As the article says, for the Pats, it was signing Parcells in 1993 that turned this franchise around after thirty years of drifting (amid an occasional playoff game).
The way this franchise is run, I can't see a drought for more than a year or two before they turn it around. In the NFL, it's tougher to stay on top with player bickering, injuries and coaching changes (see Eagles, Philadelphia 2005 for reference). The fact that the Pats made it to the second round of the playoffs with coaching changes, and all those injuries compared to other teams in the same situation is a testament to their tenacity. That's not an excuse but an explanation. All teams have injuries and eventually they catch up to you but to go 10-6 with a QB with a hernia and a MASH unit, is pretty impressive...... It's not a SB year but look down I-95 at Philly to see how bad it could be.......
Just my $0.02,