Both argue that Tomase's only real mistake was to say Walsh "videotaped" the walkthrough instead of "monitored" the walkthrough. I say that is a BS excuse to help out their friend.
Even if the word were changed, its still wrong as Tomase had no proof that Walsh was there, just that someone had heard that he was there.
If local sports reporters can't figure out the difference between rumors and claims that have evidence, they shouldn't have jobs.
And that word change would've made the article even more absurd. If the Pats wanted to monitor the Ram's practice, they would send a guy who has no clue about football?











