I admire your steadfast ignorance. It really is something to behold.
The fact is you have one season to point to that represents this so called decline. Wouldn't you need yet another to truly prove your "theory" beyond a shadow of a doubt? Not much of a sample you have there. One year? A QB rating down 4.4 points? A yards per completion average one yard less than the year before? It's so absurd it makes me laugh. File under: square peg, round hole.
You really are stupid.
I stated that Brady's skills declined in 2006 which the stats illustrate quite well. I don't need another season because I never commented on Brady's dimnished performance for any season except the 2006 season. I really cannot help you if you still cannot grasp this simple point.
And actually, when one clearly holds some sort of bizarre resentment towards one player as you clearly do which is clear in numerous posts you've made throughout the season, looking at stats and actually forming an objective thought based anaylsis is impossible. That's why you have such difficulty with it.
The only thing bizarre in this thread is your continued need to make false claims. Well actually, it isn't really bizarre since it's the only way you can keep attention off the fact that you have been shown to be a liar.
If you did not have this strange fixation on Brady's sex life, and his "declining" skills, you'd look at those numbers and see Brady has had 6 very good seasons compared to 1 subpar (by your definition) season and conclude it could be an abberation, an off year, a mulligan, but hardly enough to conclude that he has "topped out". Of course, again, that would require something beyond a knee jerk thought process which you apparently are incapable of. File under: Moonbat.
Again - let me know when you get back to reality.
As to your query about you implying this and that, you have in fact stated that Brady's baby issue coupled with his so called "declining" skills would give BB political cover with fans should he decide to release or trade him. Will you now attempt to deny that as well, or will you actually stand behind something you've said in previous posts?
You claimed that I "implied/say things and then claim not to have said them". I've said over and over again that Brady's classless behaviour tarnishes his reputation and makes it easier for Belichick to get rid of him if necessary (i.e. "political cover"). Since I have never denied this, it isn't evidence of YOUR claim. So I'm afraid you'll have to try again.
Of course what you didn't factor into this "theory" are the cap ramifications of such a move which would be disasterous to the organization. I guess that fact escaped you while you were busy sharpening your ax and desperately trying to cobble together your next semi-coherent response.
I wonder if Brady's YPC drops by another yard next year if he will make that move? Somehow I doubt it.
It's apparent that you do not understand the meaning of the word 'if' - ask your teacher to explain it to you. Then get back to me.
Cassel can do what Brady can? Hilarious. If that's so, why isn't he doing it? The coaching staff felt so comfortable with him, they signed Testaverde. Bulger could do what Brady did in the SB? If that's so, why hasn't he done it? Near as I can tell, Tory Holt and Steven Jackson are excellent weapons. Why is Bulger 0-1 in playoff appearences?
It takes a TEAM to win games - not three players. What exactly has Brady done in the SB that Bulger couldn't have done? It should be easy for you to come up with several examples since it's so obvious, rather than simple denials which do nothing to help your claim.
Furthermore, how do you know Bulger could do it when he's never been put in that situation? Maybe he could, maybe he couldn't. Of course we don't know because he hasn't been there. Brady has proven he can. Care to disagree? Or did we all imagine 3 SB wins and 2 SB MVPs he played a major role in? This is the part where you minimize Brady's contributions to those wins with the impotent "it's a team game" response. I'll go ahead and respond. Indeed it is a team game. But some positions are more important than others and QB happens to be one of them.
I don't KNOW (i.e. with certainty) what Bulger would have done had he been in those situations. However, Brady's play wasn't exceptional for the most part in the games leading up to and including the SB. Therefore it's not unreasonable to believe that another QB, including Bulger could have done the same. (i.e. average performances, by defintion, are not difficult to replicate)_ Brady has proven that he can have a positive contribution to a team that has the parts to win a SB. He has also proven these last two years that he cannot carry a team and that he can contribute negatively to a team that has the parts to win a SB. The importance of the QB or any other player on a football team is determined by the abilities of the other parts of the team. There's a reason Baltimore won a SB with Trent Dilfer.
Again, please keep desperately trying to prove this so called decline and how we could plug Cassel, whoever, into the lineup and be just fine. You brought that point up in a thread earlier this year, which I'm sure you've now convienently forgotten. It really is quite amusing in a train wreck, look at the freak, kind of way. I can't help but notice nobody is jumping in to validate your "theory". I wonder why? Clearly, you have no doubts about your "theory" , it's interesting there aren't legions of posters rallying to your side.
I've already "proven" the decline - you have already proven the decline so I'm curious to know why you continue to argue the point. I do think the Patriots would still be competitive with Cassel as QB. Cassel hasn't played that much so my opinion is based on a small sample. However, when Cassel has played, he has played well and most importantly, he looks to be improved with each opportunity he has gotten. It's rather ironic that you would consider such a scenario "hilarious" considering that it has already occurred in New England and on several other teams in the league - i.e. young unproven QBs being thrust successfully into starting roles.
It's another sad illustration of your immaturity that you would equate validity with popularity. It's rather ironic that you imply that my opinion isn't valid because "legions of posters [aren't] rallying to my side" while apparently being blissfully ignorant of the fact that "legions of posters" aren't "rallying to YOUR side". Thus, your OWN opinion isn't valid using the basis that YOU have provided. It's sad that you're too stupid to not have figured that out before you wrote about "legions of posters". LMAO.
Okay, I'll admit, it was mostly funny as hell...but it's a bit sad that such stupidity exists in individuals like you.
Regardless, I'll keep rubbing your nose in it. It's quite enjoyable. Easy, but enjoyable. I find it's the simple things in life that make it so worthwhile and this is quite simple. Until next time...
Weird - you cannot even form your own thoughts to write but instead use statements or phrases that others have said to you. Guess that explains the "obsession with Brady's sex life" comment. Your behaviour definitely does fit that of someone with mental challenges.
