After 2 games (with Denver still to play tomorrow night against Atlanta) the AFC currently looks like:
2-0: Houston, San Diego, possibly Denver
1-1: New England, Jets, Miami, Buffalo, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, possibly Denver
0-2: Jacksonville, Tennessee, Oakland, Kansas City, Cleveland
With San Francisco, Detroit and Atlanta still to play the NFC currently looks like:
2-0: Philadelphia, Arizona, one of SF/Detroit, maybe Atlanta
1-1: Dallas, Giants, Washington, Green Bay, Chicago, Minnesota, Seattle, St. Louis, Carolina, Tampa Bay, one of Detroit/SF, maybe Atlanta
0-2: New Orleans
It's a little early to be crying over one loss. As the OP notes, the Pats went on an 8-0 tear in 2010 after losing to Cleveland in a "trap game". Last year the Pats were pushed around by the Steelers and lost back-to-back games before winning 10 in a row (8 regular season and 2 post-season) to go to the Super Bowl.
We knew there were a lot of new pieces on this team. There were bound to be some growing pains. I'm guessing the coaching staff will figure out how to work things out, even if there may be another bump or two on the road.
The Pats' "creampuff" schedule doesn't look that soft right now. The NFC West is very strong - San Francisco dominated Green Bay, Arizona is 2-0, Seattle and the Rams are both 1-1 and are coming off wins against solid NFC East teams. Denver beat Pittsburgh last week, and Peyton Manning is always a challenge. Houston and Baltimore are possible our strongest competitors in the AFC. Not a cakewalk schedule as things currently stand.