Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,971
- Reaction score
- 21,041
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No they just don't overspend. They avoid Black Friday. They shop on 12/23Patriots seem afraid to announce anything with the league’s selective enforcement of the rules like when the Chiefs randomly got screwed on the Malclin deal and Dolphins signing Suh amongst others got off Scott free.
Yet we just saw it work as designed:Why even have a tampering window anymore? They should just start Free Agency all at once so it’s more like it used to be.
It’s also seeming like taking visits isn’t something that’s very necessary for many players anymore. Hopefully they change this setup in future offseasons.
They have the “tampering window” because teams are going to tamper anyway. No matter what date you set as the first date of the new league year, the tampering will already be well underway. At least this way, it can be more open.Why even have a tampering window anymore? They should just start Free Agency all at once so it’s more like it used to be.
It’s also seeming like taking visits isn’t something that’s very necessary for many players anymore. Hopefully they change this setup in future offseasons.
Seems like we didn’t care two years ago when we signed Gilmore.Patriots seem afraid to announce anything with the league’s selective enforcement of the rules like when the Chiefs randomly got screwed on the Malclin deal and Dolphins signing Suh amongst others got off Scott free.
Wasn’t that the start of the real free agency?Seems like we didn’t care two years ago when we signed Gilmore.
Welcome to the Internet Era.If the bloodsucking "reporters" would just wait till players can officially sign before reporting the deal, then it would be better.
Raiders.. but I see the pointDo you REALLY think that the Niners didn't severely tamper with the Pats Trent Brown. How else can you explain how they had a multi page contract for SIXTY-SIX million dollars ready FIVE minutes after the "legal tampering" period began.
Of COURSE (I'm getting a little bit pissed here) they tampered with Brown well before it was legal. Of COURSE nothing is going to happen to them given the very selective nature of the NFL's discipline policies.
If any team had any respect for the league's rules (except when they pertain to the Patriots) the Niner's could have waited about 12 hours if only to maintain the semblance of abiding by the rules. Nothing would have changed, its not like they "stole" Brown from us. But because the league doesn't enforce SOME of their rules on a regular basis, SOME teams feel free to flaunt the rules to their own advantage.
Yea I'm kinda confused why there is one too.Why even have a tampering window anymore? They should just start Free Agency all at once so it’s more like it used to be.
It’s also seeming like taking visits isn’t something that’s very necessary for many players anymore. Hopefully they change this setup in future offseasons.
Do you REALLY think that the Niners didn't severely tamper with the Pats Trent Brown. How else can you explain how they had a multi page, and I'm sure complex contract for SIXTY-SIX million dollars ready FIVE minutes after the "legal tampering" period began.
Of COURSE (I'm getting a little bit pissed here) they tampered with Brown well before it was legal. Of COURSE nothing is going to happen to them given the very selective nature of the NFL's discipline policies.
If any team had any respect for the league's rules (except when they pertain to the Patriots) the Niner's could have waited about 12 hours if only to maintain the semblance of abiding by the rules. Nothing would have changed, its not like they "stole" Brown from us. But because the league doesn't enforce SOME of their rules on a regular basis, SOME teams feel free to flaunt the rules to their own advantage.
Because NE can now chose to offer Brown $66,000,001 and see if he takes it.Yea I'm kinda confused why there is one too.
I have to agree. What difference does it make? It's not like any team is at an unfair advantage or something with the way things are. I agree that it's basically purely semantics.I have no problem with it, it’s just the start of free agency a couple of days before the league calendar officially turns over. It’s semantics.
Yet we just saw it work as designed:
Pro Bowl linebacker Anthony Barr spurns Jets in free agency, decides to re-sign with Vikings
Barr got himself an offer from da Jete to determine his market value then MIN got a chance to sweeten the offer without Barr being sucked into the deep green slime swamps of NJ.
I'm sure MIN wishes he was cheaper, but at least they got a chance to sign him before he committed to da Jete and before they committed to some other free agent and didn't have the cap space to match da Jete's offer.
Because NE can now chose to offer Brown $66,000,001 and see if he takes it.
Or in honor of Gronk, NE could offer $69,696,696.
Without the tampering period he'd already be a Raider.
With it, a counter offer could be made, just like happened with Barr.
That, and it stretches out this FA thing over more days.
Besides, the illegal tampering was happening before and the League could not stop it.
It's next to impossible to tell people what they can and cannot talk about.
Thus we have the illegal tampering period.
Now, about those non-guaranteed guarantees...
And get off my lawn!