- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,487
- Reaction score
- 1,354
Agreed. Ben Tate would be a reasonable choice at 53.
He means Golden...I think
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Agreed. Ben Tate would be a reasonable choice at 53.
This was to be the most imp pick in the Belichick era, and its not the best choice... terrible pick, not the player, but where they picked him... Im stunned right now..
Tomorrow is a new draft. There are 9 passrushers available. 2 quarterbackers figure to be near the top. We have picks 12, 15 and 21 in the 2nd, and the 26th pick in the 3rd.
You dont draft certain players because of what other teams do.
robertweathers said:Still need to draft on the D-Line and OLB but I had CB as a pretty big need for three reasons.
1) Fins and Jets improved their respective passing games
2) Whilhite and Wheatley are at best marginal CBs
3) Good cover guys help the pass rushWe have a BINGO!
another 4th.
Its not about the player, its a need... We need pass rushers and playmakers... sorry but this is not going to help right away...
You know what's funny about all of you guys whining about this pick? It's that in the end, all it comes down to is whether or not the guy is good. And we have no idea about that right now. I remember how psyched everyone was when we picked Maroney, because everyone had heard of Maroney. And how bummed people were when we picked Mankins, because nobody had heard of Mankins. People were psyched about Brace, bummed about Vollmer. And so on.
The Patriots really only had two reliable corners, Bodden and Butler. They also were terrible both on special teams coverage and on special teams returns. If I'm not mistaken the Pats were last in the league in kickoff returns. If the kid is a good returner and a good corner, it's a good pick. If he's not, it's not. It's that simple. Almost all the draft sites had him in the 20-40 range. It's not a crazy pick.
The first round is all about getting a guy who is going to be on the field a lot for you. A guy who is a major contributor both on defense and on special teams is worth a first round pick. If he's good. But you don't know if he's good, do you? None of us do.
Well said.So lots of people hating the McCourty pick but from the sounds of it this kid epitomizes a Patriot. He does it all. Returns kicks, blocks kicks, toughness, hard worker, quickness, run support, instincts, press coverage, good hands, etc...
The ONLY knock on the kid seems to be he needs to add a little muscle to shed some of the bigger receivers... and people are PISSED?
Ambivalent on Odrick, wouldn't have minded Bryant.
What's your point?
In today's NFL a better approach (unless you have a Revis) is - a good pash rush helps the cover guys.
Erm, yes you do. You react to other teams.
And aren't you the one shaking and trembling about upgrading the pass rush?
Didn't EVERYONE on here bash Wilhite and Wheatley all last season? So now we are trying to correct the problem and now BB gets bashed again. Good God. It's a WR's league, and we just took a step towards slowing down some WR's.
People are never happy. Yes, I wanted someone else also. But this pick makes sense.
He means Golden...I think
No but he better turn out to be a baller when you pass up people like Bryant or Ordick.
Didn't EVERYONE on here bash Wilhite and Wheatley all last season? So now we are trying to correct the problem and now BB gets bashed again. Good God. It's a WR's league, and we just took a step towards slowing down some WR's.
People are never happy. Yes, I wanted someone else also. But this pick makes sense.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











