No, it's not bad defense.
The key reason is that the officials did not call a single offensive holding penalty all game long. But believe me, there was PLENTY of holding. There have been other games where very little holding was called, but zero holding penalties in the Super Bowl. Not only zero holding penalties, but it was clear from the outset the the refs simply weren't going to call holding. And that allowed two good offensive lines to keep their quarterbacks pretty clean. Consider:
During the regular season, New England had 42 sacks and Philly had 38. That's 80 sacks between the two teams over a combined 32 games. That comes to 2.5 sacks per game on average.
During the playoffs, the Patriots had 11 sacks in two games coming into the Super Bowl. Philadelphia had 4 in two games coming into the Super Bowl. Both Philly and NE have very good offensive lines, but it's very difficult to believe that neither team could get a sack until the very end of the game, without there being some pretty major holding going on.
And it wasn't like both teams only threw short, quick passes. Philly went deep down the field 9 times, and New England 13 times. Those plays take a lot of time.
Any competent NFL quarterback is going to perform at a fairly high level if he is given excellent protection. One reason why Foles' throws were so accurate is that he was kept clean all game long. Same with Brady. The non-holding benefitted both teams, both offenses. On many of the completions, especially those downfield but also the more intermediate routes, receivers were covered very well. Re-watch the Jefferey touchdown, the Clement touchdown (which shouldn't have counted, but whatever), and the Gronk corner touchdown. On three of those plays, the defense was RIGHT THERE in excellent position. It's just that the throws were perfect and the receivers made terrific catches. If the QBs are pressured in those situations, they almost certainly do not make such accurate throws.
Personally I enjoyed having few flags thrown. I want to see the athletes do their thing. But the Patriots got away with a fair number of holds, and James Harrison was grabbed around the neck numerous times. No flags. When the OL is allowed to do that, the quarterbacks stay clean, and can deliver the ball accurately. Foles may not be Joe Montana, but he doesn't have to be in order to perform at a high level if he's never going to be touched. And he's never going to be touched if an already good offensive line is allowed to hold like crazy without impunity. Similarly, if you give an all-time great like Brady the time he had this game, he's going to absolutely dissect even a terrific defense (Philly was #4 in points and #4 in yards allowed). Which is precisely what he did.
It's easy to blame the defenses, but the biggest reason the offenses just rolled all game long wasn't because of bad defense. It was because two offensive lines were allowed to grab, maul, hook, yank, and drag defenders all game long, keeping their QBs clean all night. That's both good OL play and a tip of the cap to the officials, who simply refused to call an offensive holding penalty all night long.
That's the biggest explanation for the shootout we saw in Super Bowl 52.
The key reason is that the officials did not call a single offensive holding penalty all game long. But believe me, there was PLENTY of holding. There have been other games where very little holding was called, but zero holding penalties in the Super Bowl. Not only zero holding penalties, but it was clear from the outset the the refs simply weren't going to call holding. And that allowed two good offensive lines to keep their quarterbacks pretty clean. Consider:
During the regular season, New England had 42 sacks and Philly had 38. That's 80 sacks between the two teams over a combined 32 games. That comes to 2.5 sacks per game on average.
During the playoffs, the Patriots had 11 sacks in two games coming into the Super Bowl. Philadelphia had 4 in two games coming into the Super Bowl. Both Philly and NE have very good offensive lines, but it's very difficult to believe that neither team could get a sack until the very end of the game, without there being some pretty major holding going on.
And it wasn't like both teams only threw short, quick passes. Philly went deep down the field 9 times, and New England 13 times. Those plays take a lot of time.
Any competent NFL quarterback is going to perform at a fairly high level if he is given excellent protection. One reason why Foles' throws were so accurate is that he was kept clean all game long. Same with Brady. The non-holding benefitted both teams, both offenses. On many of the completions, especially those downfield but also the more intermediate routes, receivers were covered very well. Re-watch the Jefferey touchdown, the Clement touchdown (which shouldn't have counted, but whatever), and the Gronk corner touchdown. On three of those plays, the defense was RIGHT THERE in excellent position. It's just that the throws were perfect and the receivers made terrific catches. If the QBs are pressured in those situations, they almost certainly do not make such accurate throws.
Personally I enjoyed having few flags thrown. I want to see the athletes do their thing. But the Patriots got away with a fair number of holds, and James Harrison was grabbed around the neck numerous times. No flags. When the OL is allowed to do that, the quarterbacks stay clean, and can deliver the ball accurately. Foles may not be Joe Montana, but he doesn't have to be in order to perform at a high level if he's never going to be touched. And he's never going to be touched if an already good offensive line is allowed to hold like crazy without impunity. Similarly, if you give an all-time great like Brady the time he had this game, he's going to absolutely dissect even a terrific defense (Philly was #4 in points and #4 in yards allowed). Which is precisely what he did.
It's easy to blame the defenses, but the biggest reason the offenses just rolled all game long wasn't because of bad defense. It was because two offensive lines were allowed to grab, maul, hook, yank, and drag defenders all game long, keeping their QBs clean all night. That's both good OL play and a tip of the cap to the officials, who simply refused to call an offensive holding penalty all night long.
That's the biggest explanation for the shootout we saw in Super Bowl 52.