PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

The case will be heard in NY. MN judge orders it moved

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is not an appealable order.
 
The Manhattan Federal Court and the Judge assigned to the NFL suit are not know for being pro big business and conservative. The NFL preferred Manhattan to MN, but it isn't like they filed in a court that is clearly biased to their plight.

the judge is a clinton appointee (and hopefully pro labor).
 
I'm not surprised.... not because I know law or anything. Its just that I'm starting to believe the NFL* outmaneuvers Brady and the Pats with everything. Every time it looks like there's hope it gets squashed and the NFL* comes out the winner. I'm not giving up all hope but we need a Butler type legal interception to use an analogy...but the refs keep throwing a flag every time we think we made a positive play.
 
SDNY is not an especially bad forum or jurisdiction. Like anywhere else, there are some excellent judges there, and some not-so good ones. I have not practiced before Judge Berman before, but I understand that he is a respected judge.
 
the minnesota judge is right - there are absolutely NO ties to minnesota whatsoever.
 
SDNY is not an especially bad forum or jurisdiction. Like anywhere else, there are some excellent judges there, and some not-so good ones. I have not practiced before Judge Berman before, but I understand that he is a respected judge.

That's good to hear. The NFL has had influence on the SDNY before. When the SDNY froze online poker accounts the NFL was very involved because the NFL didn't want online gambling to continue growing. This was likely so that the NFL could help set up more "official" avenues of online gambling that it could profit from in terms of branding/licensing.

I guess it's the SDNY attorneys that I have a bigger issue with than SDNY judges.
 
The Manhattan Federal Court and the Judge assigned to the NFL suit are not know for being pro big business and conservative. The NFL preferred Manhattan to MN, but it isn't like they filed in a court that is clearly biased to their plight.

No one knows really.

Some of the most awful decisions have come out of that court this year. The court sided with the vulture funds over Argentina on debt even though Argentina already had deals to pay back creditors in collective action clauses, yet the court gave primary rights to late-comer vulture funds. The judge even admitted he was ill-equipped to examine the intricacies of radical banking laws.
 
I am fine with it. It is all about the kind of judge you get. It looks like they are getting a liberal judge that is pro union. I don't believe a federal judge even if he turns out to be a NY sports fan would let that influence him.

A lot of people have seem to have overlooked the fact that the judge used to be a principal in the law firm that represented the NFL against the USFL (and lost).

Something tells me this judge knows the NFL business pretty well.
 
Well we've been in the NFL's court up to this point. It was never going to go our way.

And now we're in the NFL's court again.
 
Why couldn't they just file in Massachusetts?
 
A lot of people have seem to have overlooked the fact that the judge used to be a principal in the law firm that represented the NFL against the USFL (and lost).

Something tells me this judge knows the NFL business pretty well.

Well, if that is the case, the NFLPA will file to have him recused for conflicts of interest.
 
Yeah I've tried to be positive through this whole thing, but I just have a sinking feeling that this is going to get crapped on by this (or any) NY judge. And I am sure the PA will appeal again after that, but the idea of Week 1 without Brady is getting realer as the seconds tick by.
 
seems like everything goes the nfl's way.
at this point, i expect tom to sit out the 4 games. hope we win at least 1 game...possibly two.

in case you didnt know, the players association is a ****ing joke
 
Yeah I've tried to be positive through this whole thing, but I just have a sinking feeling that this is going to get crapped on by this (or any) NY judge. And I am sure the PA will appeal again after that, but the idea of Week 1 without Brady is getting realer as the seconds tick by.

There will be no injunction if they file for an appeal and the case is not taken but dismissed by the court.
 
Why couldn't they just file in Massachusetts?

I'm wondering about that as well. I've never appeared in a MA federal court but I've heard bad things.

How bad could it be? There no way it could be worse than a NY venue in this case, could it?
 
What about the "first to file correctly rule" or is that not a thing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Uncategorized
twitter.com · by mayoclinic
3h
𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Uncategorized
twitter.com · by Uptown
1d
📰
📰 Article
Schefter: ‘Talks are nowhere’ between Christian Gonzalez, Patriots
Uncategorized
boston.com · by JoeSixPat
1d
𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Uncategorized
twitter.com · by Uptown
3d
📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by One-If-By-Sea
8d
📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by Clonamery
10d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Schefter on Giants Offer For Cam Ward
twitter.com · by Uptown
17d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @NFL on X: Drake Maye No. 11 on the NFL Top 100 of 2026
Patriots Videos
x.com · by Ian
19d
MORSE: Patriots at Seahawks – Opening Night Matchup
Gonzalez Signing Clears Up Final Hurdle For Patriots Ahead Of Opener
MORSE: Preview of The Seattle Seahawks Opening Night
Patriots News 09-06: Key Matchups Against The Seahawks
MORSE: Comparing the 2025 Roster to This Year’s Roster
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 9/3
MORSE: Patriots Busy Adding to 53-Man Roster and Practice Squad
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Press Conference 9/1
MORSE: Patriots Roster Remains in Flux
Breaking Down the Patriots’ 2026 Initial 53-Man Roster
Back
Top