- Joined
- Mar 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,815
- Reaction score
- 6,917
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Does shaving off a second or so, make him a better receiver. I thought it was more about running routes and catching the ball.except its football, not track & field.
Well by that logic we have to go by his tape, which is really good.Does shaving off a second or so, make him a better receiver. I thought it was more about running routes and catching the ball.
Difference was tet was shut down in double coverage... by northern arizonaJustin Jefferson senior year v. Vanderbilt. 2 receptions 18 yards
Jamar Chase v the all powerful Georgia Southern 2 receptions 21 yards his senior year
They both seem to be OK
Shaving off a second would make him the fastest nan who ever livedDoes shaving off a second or so, make him a better receiver. I thought it was more about running routes and catching the ball.
he'd be gad-damned forrest gump if he was that fast...Does shaving off a second or so, make him a better receiver.
That would be .05 of a difference over 40 yards though…or .0125/10 yards…..4.48 vs. 4.53 is actually a pretty significant difference in the world of 40 times.
So you watched an Arizona vs Northern Arizona game?Difference was tet was shut down in double coverage... by northern arizona
the jefferon/chase games im sure you cherry picked because of stats... hmmm... did you actually watch them?
im guessing not
vs vanderbilt... that was the jamarr chase 229 yd 4 td game
vs georgia southern, chase just wasn't targeted... he was open the whole game,,, joe brady just didnt ring up his number that much
so... back to Tet and his 2/11 performance vs northern arizona...
He looks like a 4.6+ guy to me and I personally don't see impressive acceleration. The talent of the opponents DBs matters and he largely beat up on second tier programs/rosters.You're missing the point. Tet on tape beat the guys he was against and was catching wide open.
The knock against him was competition and the theory that he'd test slow at the combine and it would prove he was a mirage who would need to catch contested catches. It was typical draft FUD. And frankly most of it was Pats fans comparing him to Harry.
Well he didn't run slow. So now that the pearl clutching was unfounded we can evaluate his tape for what it was and it was a guy who was winning his match ups while also having great size for his position and having the physical profile you would want to create mismatches.
This was a case of the "yeah but" being held against him and it now being unfounded. Not a case of a guy the tape said we should worry about and grasping at straws over the first bit of a contradictory evidence.
You are ignoring years and years of evidence that hand-timed 40s are consistently slower than laser-timed 40s by a significant margin. If multiple scouts have him hand-timed between 4.53 and 4.59 come in all likelihood that translates to a combine laser timed run a 4.6+. There is a reason that he chose to run only at his pro day and then run only one 40. This is all planned by his agent. The 4.48 was clearly propaganda, leaked by his agent.I don’t think it’s fair to assume he would run a laser 4.6+. Literally all the reports have him hand timed under 4.6. His tape puts him in the top 5. He’s top 5 on nearly all big boards. He was expected to drop only because people assumed he would not run or run a 4.6+. That didn’t happen, so he would be a fine choice at #4.
16 inchesThat would be .05 of a difference over 40 yards though…or .0125/10 yards…..
So you watched an Arizona vs Northern Arizona game?
You don't need to over draft a WR with warts and expect success. Im a firm believer in drafting the best talent as opposed to need.You can't leave Maye high and dry another year on offense and expect him to develop. We've been doing this "let's keep going defense because we know how to identify talent there" and the offense has suffered and it just isn't working out.
We can't draft a second rookie QB in the last 5 years and spend another year not giving him anything. It's complete insanity.
Honestly I don't think Vrabel wanted him.Metcalf didn't want to come here or we would have made the trade. We certainly had better picks to offer than the Steelers.
Speed in four directions is just as important if not more than speed in one direction.Will those matter?? I see CB's Backing off nonetheless.
| 10 | 915 |
| 8 | 836 |
| 79 | 4K |
| 31 | 961 |
| 0 | 214 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











