- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,673
- Reaction score
- 778
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am saying that the Patriots big money deals have been back-loaded. (Amendola, Gronk, Mayo, Wilfork, Mankins).Are you suggesting Patriots' contracts are typically MORE backloaded than other teams'?
It is a cliche that almost none of the really big deals get played out. However, I'm pretty sure Ty Law played through his whole contract. And a lot of Patriots were traded, but got their contracts paid out by their new teams -- you'd know the details better than I, but I'm thinking of Mankins, Moss, McGinest, Vrabel, Seymour and others.
As I have mentioned before, this is Revis's first time with a truly professional organization from top to bottom. He has never won this much in the NFL.
I think that will give him plenty of thought on the logic of signing with a dysfunctional franchise simply for more money.
I am saying that the Patriots big money deals have been back-loaded. (Amendola, Gronk, Mayo, Wilfork, Mankins).
I'm pretty sure that Law did not play out his entire contract.
The Patriots are known for getting rid of a player a year early. Are you saying that perception is wrong?
I am not comparing the Patriots contracts to the rest of the league.
To give my opinion that it will not be the money that cause any possible impasse but the structure. Are there other teams who also backload their deals? Yes. There are also teams who use a pay as you go approach. There are also teams who have even-level cap hits.Then what was your point in starting this thread?
When you shouted "Are you suggesting Patriots' contracts are typically MORE backloaded than other teams'?" I took MORE as relating to the player's contract that was backloaded. Now that I think that the more applies to the percentage of Patriots contracts. It would be helpful in the future to not use ALL caps.
How about your 3 yr/42 million (14 million AAV) proposal with something of an 18 million dollar SB (your example), and salary structures of 7, 8, and 9 for the three years?
Thanks for reminding me that I need to be more aware of my audience. When I created this thread the notion of how other teams structure their deals was not in forefront of my mind. Maybe it should have been.Then what was your point in starting this thread?
Thanks for reminding me that I need to be more aware of my audience. When I created this thread the notion of how other teams structure their deals was not in forefront of my mind. Maybe it should have been.
I don't know where the disagreements are.
Thanks for reminding me that I need to be more aware of my audience. When I created this thread the notion of how other teams structure their deals was not in forefront of my mind. Maybe it should have been.
Miguel postulated that NE's tendency to backload contracts might be a problem. A few asked why that should be a particular item of interest when every other team does the same thing and NE actually has a history of giving more "real" contracts to elite players.
If NE backloaded contracts more dramatically or more frequently it would be a much bigger concern. To me, anyway.
Not every other team backloads the contracts. Where is this history? Is it with Mankins? Wilfork? Mayo? Gronk?A few asked why that should be a particular item of interest when every other team does the same thing and NE actually has a history of giving more "real" contracts to elite players.
Tell that to Seymour, Moss, Mankins, Mayo, Amendola, and Gronk. To say that the Patriots have largely avoid giving backloaded contracts is to ignore the history.Since BB eliminated the CAP Hell he found here, his first year, the Team has managed to largely avoid them
| 11 | 551 |
| 7 | 2K |
| 14 | 824 |
| 13 | 897 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 24 - June 8 (Through 26yrs)










