When people who like Zappe are strawmanned as believing the team is keeping a "star" on the bench, we can't really have a proper discussion.
I don't think anyone - save for a few ridiculous people - have suggested Zappe is our lord and savior and a guaranteed future star. Several upon several have said they admired his poise, pocket presence, decision making, the timing and rhythm with which he operated the offense, and would like to see him get the opportunity to play more.
The lack of nuance in these discussions is really a shame. There's a legitimately interesting conversation to be had here but it's dominated by one-liners, potshots, and tribalism.
The other part of this that gets lost is the fact that at the end of the day, he's part of the team and is someone who everyone should still be rooting for. I've said repeatedly that Mac has the edge on him right now, but it's entirely possible that changes, especially with an entire offseason to work on the same self-improvement areas that Mac did last offseason. Brady wasn't great in 2000 but he took a giant step forward the next year and had been pushing Drew in camp. Obviously, we know what happened from there.
The disconnect - or at least this was my feeling - was that during the season the decision had been made, and it was what it was, all we could do was hope for Mac to play well. Complaining about them not making a move was counterproductive. Just like I don't want to get into threads about firing Bill this offseason, it's not happening.
So that was my take during the season, no point in having threads that essentially created additional animosity. They've invested a lot of time in Mac, so it made sense to see it through. And he did improve down the stretch, even though there's no convincing anyone of that. I've mentioned it in another post, but my biggest frustration was the people who every week kept dismissing the positives and focusing on the negatives. That's just not a lot of fun for anybody.
However, I know you're bothered by some other people's takes that were a little more extreme, which I completely understand. It doesn't - and shouldn't - have to be one or the other. He's part of the team, and it behooves all of us for him to also get better.
At the same time, this offseason, training camp, and preseason are going to be telling because if Zappe competes hard and shows a ton of promise, Mac's leash will definitely be shorter next season if he doesn't improve or falters. Especially since Bill can't afford to ignore it if Zappe does, indeed, push him and/or outperform him in practice. Bill absolutely has to win next year, which is probably the first time any of us have ever seen him really in that position.
Truthfully, he's lucky to have two good young quarterbacks. And honestly, it's a better position to be in than to, say, have Mac, Hoyer, and some practice squad guy. They obviously drafted Zappe for a reason, and we all have to hope he's successful because none of us know how things will go. If Mac turns it around and plays like the guy we saw in the first half of the Buffalo game all season, great. If he's not, at least there's someone who showed enough in relief this season that they may potentially have another answer. Not a lot of teams can say that.
In the end, we all want the same thing. We just want the team to get back into the mix. How they get there, I guess, is the question all of us have, and it will be something that will be interesting for us all to continue to follow this offseason.