Despite all the posturing at BSPN, the issue was never in doubt. That's how badly the NFL "brain trust" bungled this case. It was NEVER in doubt. The only people who thought the issue was in doubt were people who didn't know enough of the facts or people who were carrying Goodell's water
I have a feeling putting in crap suppositions like that is the price Reiss has to pay in order to get the other 90% of his stuff published. BSPN needs to be boycotted, even Mike. It's a cesspool down there and they aren't doing anything to clean it up.
Example: After pushing the point prior to the Berman decision that the case had nothing to do whether anything happened or not; BSPN is now pushing the idea that Berman didn't exonerate Brady, and continuing the "he's still guilty, but got off on a technicality" narrative at every chance.
Mike Reiss can decide to swallow his pride and honor in order to feed his family. I can understand it. However the fact that he's good at what he does, doesn't make me have to support BSPN or any of their outlets. Fortunately there are enough outlets that can get me the same info as Mike did. Besides ANYTHING that comes with a BSPN byline is subject to question just on that alone. In other words, if BSPN told me the sun was setting in the west, I go outside with a compas before I'd believe it.