- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 32,653
- Reaction score
- 23,194
Amendola is scheduled to be paid $3M ($2M guaranteed). Are you suggesting that no other team would pay him $2M plus incentives if the patriots cut him after refusing a pay reduction?
We're talking about Lloyd here. There should be a market for Amendola if the team is foolish enough to cut him. He has no reason to accept a reduction in compensation. He is guaranteed $2M, plus another million when he is on the starting roster for the season.
Any concerns with Danny Amendola are rather low on my list, and I'd have to suspect that Belichick likely feels the same at this current moment. Now...if he has another mediocre or even poor year in 2014 or 2015 (by Belichick's standards....not ours, as we have no idea what his assignments are under these conditions), then maybe they'd approach him for a possible pay cut. Under those circumstances, yes, I believe that he'd be inclined to stay. After all, if the conditions are so bad that we'd consider approaching him with an ultimatum due to injuries or poor play, then why would his buzz be any different around the rest of the NFL?
I'm not even coming close to referring to anything about this year, so his 2013 base salary of 2m, total salary of 3m, and 3.5m dollar cap hit are all completely irrelevant; hence the ridiculous overreacting that we continue so see from a handful of posters after one mediocre year, which also happens to have some very odd unusual circumstances behind it that probably won't continue moving forward.
I've said many times now that I do not believe that 2013 showed us good enough sample sizes of either one of Amendola or Edelman, so I doubt that either one is as good or as bad as they may have appeared to some impatient or overreacting fans. We really didn't have many options at the position of WR this season, so that likely played into the equation in my opinion.












