Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 16,050
- Reaction score
- 21,256
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.yeah, cause the Pats are always signing high priced free agents to off set whatever Collins would have gotten....
I'm just really surprised they traded him the day after the game when they have the whole bye week to work out a better deal... Belichick must've been really mad when he saw the tapes last night.
This move is absolutely stupid. I'd rather win a Super Bowl and let him walk for nothing then trade him to the Browns for what's gonna be a low 4th when it's all said and done since it's a compensatory pick.
I'm sorry, this is without a doubt the worst trade Bill has ever made and makes no sense whatsoever.
Mankins was washed up. Jones you got a decent haul for and had time to replace him.
But trading your best LB mid season for a pick when you're defense clearly isn't all there yet, lacking a pass rush, just to save money?
WTF
hahahaha
OverTheCap.com says Mack will give the Browns a third round pick pick and they've been very good in the past. Technically, there had to be a contingency plan in case Mack is cut before week 10, because then he wouldn't count for the comp pick formula. Mack is not going to be cut, so it's probably pretty safe.Quick question (and I saw the tweet posted somewhere else in the thread but can't find it again).
Is it true that if the Borwns don't get a compensatory 3rd rounder that the trade is a 4th round pick? Also, as a Browns fourth rounder would be the highest 4th pick the Pats have (NE and Sea should have better records) this could be the pick the Pats lose for Deflategate?
If that is the case, did the Pats just trade Collins for the ability to keep two fourth round picks in 2017 or are they fairly certain the Browns will have a 3td round compensatory pick awarded.
hahahaha
It's not a money saving move.But trading your best LB mid season for a pick when you're defense clearly isn't all there yet, lacking a pass rush, just to save money?
See, you can give out good arguments.
I disagree with you on the basis that we would VERY LIKELY get the same thing (3rd/4th round comp pick) if we retained him for this year. It would take effect in 2018, so it is a one year advantage, if you want to call it like this. Plus we get the added disadvantage of having NO BACK-UPS to a good player. We have HT, which has been hurt a lot recently but is really good and Roberts, who is a rookie and not at the same level of Collins. Then we have nobody, cause Freeny is IR'ed.
I would assume "conditional" just means whether the Browns are assigned a third round comp pick or not. Every trade involving comp picks has to be conditional since they're not assigned yet.OK, I'm feeling better that it says a "Conditional" draft pick rather than a compensational. I can only hope that the condition is that the Pats get the Browns highest third round pick, and ifBrowns sign Collins to a long term deal, it esculates to a second round pick.
Even then, I would say its a bad trade, just not a horrific one.
This move is absolutely stupid. I'd rather win a Super Bowl and let him walk for nothing then trade him to the Browns for what's gonna be a low 4th when it's all said and done since it's a compensatory pick.
I'm sorry, this is without a doubt the worst trade Bill has ever made and makes no sense whatsoever.
Mankins was washed up. Jones you got a decent haul for and had time to replace him.
But trading your best LB mid season for a pick when you're defense clearly isn't all there yet, lacking a pass rush, just to save money?
WTF
if you are a player on this team and you dont yet realize that no one is more important than the other players in that locker room (outside of Brady of course) - then your career wont be long in New England... This team's motto is the Whole is greater than the sum of its parts - and it will remain that way as long as Belichick runs this team
borges and curran going at it
OK, I'm feeling better that it says a "Conditional" draft pick rather than a compensational. I can only hope that the condition is that the Pats get the Browns highest third round pick, and ifBrowns sign Collins to a long term deal, it esculates to a second round pick.
Even then, I would say its a bad trade, just not a horrific one.