Keyser Söze
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 4,398
- Reaction score
- 3,811
No I want Jimmy to stay
Yes I'm sure he'd be thrilled to be a back up for 3-4 more years. Not.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No I want Jimmy to stay
#calma
If people don't think the Pats are discussing Garoppolo down at the combine with teams then they are dumb.
Browns are underwhelmed by every QB except Trubisky. If they come out of the combine not liking what they see or hear from him. I think Garoppolo will be gone by the time free agency starts.
And if we trade Jimmy g we could be the team at the combine in a few years looking for a franchise QB or brushing the dust off a Brock Osweiler or Blake Bortles no thank you.
And if we trade Jimmy g we could be the team at the combine in a few years looking for a franchise QB or brushing the dust off a Brock Osweiler or Blake Bortles no thank you.
And if we trade Jimmy g we could be the team at the combine in a few years looking for a franchise QB or brushing the dust off a Brock Osweiler or Blake Bortles no thank you.
You're trying too hard. We all love JG but unless something happens to Brady, we'll have a different successor. There's not way around it barring Brady being traded, cut or retiring before we expect. JG is insurance not a successor.And if we trade Jimmy g we could be the team at the combine in a few years looking for a franchise QB or brushing the dust off a Brock Osweiler or Blake Bortles no thank you.
He could be franchised. It seems crazy, but if the Pats are really sold on him and have any inkling Brady might not play after 2018 it could be a possibility. Consider the scenario where Brady plays as well as he has been in 2017, so Pats franchise JG as a very expensive insurance policy and after 2018 cut ties with Brady if he shows any sign of decline. Possible?He is gone next year anyway. No way you can sign him to an extension without Brady retiring/getting injured. As he and many reporters have stated he wants to play and not sit on the bench.
He could be franchised. It seems crazy, but if the Pats are really sold on him and have any inkling Brady might not play after 2018 it could be a possibility. Consider the scenario where Brady plays as well as he has been in 2017, so Pats franchise JG as a very expensive insurance policy and after 2018 cut ties with Brady if he shows any sign of decline. Possible?
And if we trade Jimmy g we could be the team at the combine in a few years looking for a franchise QB or brushing the dust off a Brock Osweiler or Blake Bortles no thank you.
I'm with you. franchise him a year or two if you have to.No I want Jimmy to stay
This is exactly why Garoppolo should have a higher value for a team like the Browns - he doesn't have 4 years in the Browns' culture and system.The reason why jimmy g's value is not as high as some of us think is because good qbs on a rookie contract give a team a 4-5 year window to win a superbowl by getting good qb play and spending a fortune on the team around them. Think big ben, flacco, wilson, luck, newton, colin k, dak p.. all made runs on their first contract. Once you pay them the big bucks it gets much harder to win. Jimmy g is not going to give a team 5 years to spend on the rest of the team. He has to be the man right away. Even brady won rings that way to start his career but he was good enough to win it as the man as well. Not many are.