- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Re: Pats acquire DE/OLB Derrick Burgess for draft pick
That is your right.
I strongly disagree...
That is your right.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I strongly disagree...
In his defense I think his use of the term "we" is fine as I believe he meant "we" in referring to sports fans who actually think they know more than the front office
Justifying the price paid for somebody who is 31 years old, has declining sack totals, has hardly ever played the position he will be asked to play, and is in the final year of his contract, by reminding us how often the FO has swung & missed during the rounds in
which that price will be paid, doesn't exactly inspire maximum confidence in the FO's abilities in either the drafting or the trading departments.
Then again, considering how well I think that Bill has performed over the last 5/6 drafts, maybe I should hope that he trades away all of his draft picks for experienced vets, as George Allen did with the 'Skins. Because as of now, Burgess is our 2nd-best, if not best, pass-rusher...and he hasn't even played a down for us yet.
We are now officially the NY Yankees of the NFL
Spoken like a man with experience.Purple-lipped hermaphrodites?
Spoken like a man with experience.
It's amazing what soap and water can do.My lips aren't purple.
Purple-lipped hermaphrodites?
What on earth made you come up with that? lmao.
I strongly disagree.
The value of the trade is inherently dependent on actual production. It's the thoughts of perceived value that we're discussing now which are actually worthless. Who cares about our predictions today? What really matters is what actually happens on the field.
The most ridiculous discussion I've been involved in was with a poster who believed the Patriots overpaid for Wes Welker because they threw in a 7th round pick. In other words, Wes Welker might be worth a 2nd round pick, but not a 2nd rounder and 7th rounder. And the poster continued to feel that way after Welker's first year with the Pats. Incredibly stupid, IMO. Hindsight says that Welker's production is easily worth a first rounder. Some are calling him possibly the best slot receiver of all time! Simply because everyone undervalued Welker doesn't mean that he's not worth a lot more than the Patriots paid. If teams had a crystal ball and could foresee Welker's production, there's no way the Dolphins wouldn't have tendered him higher and there's no way the Dolphins would have agreed to a trade with the Patriots at the bargain price they received.
Justifying the price paid for somebody who is 31 years old, has declining sack totals, has hardly ever played the position he will be asked to play, and is in the final year of his contract, by reminding us how often the FO has swung & missed during the rounds in which that price will be paid, does not exactly instill maximum confidence in the FO for either the drafting or the trading departments.
Then again, considering how well I think that Bill has performed over the last 5/6 drafts, maybe I should hope that he trades away all of his draft picks for experienced vets, as George Allen did with the 'Skins. Because as of now, Burgess is our 2nd-best, if not best, pass-rusher...and he hasn't even played a down for us yet.