- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
Packers DE Johnny Jolly is suspended by the NFL indefinitely. Will miss at least the 2010 season.
Twitter / Greg A. Bedard: Packers DE Johnny Jolly is ...
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Packers DE Johnny Jolly is suspended by the NFL indefinitely. Will miss at least the 2010 season.
The NFL needed a hard ass commissioner, love him or hate him, he is consistant. But on this issue the CBA is clear, fail multiple drug tests and you sit a year. Not sure this situation constitutes saying "Goodell Swings the Hammer".
Yeah, well.......
Nice to see Goodell spreading the wealth around to teams besides the Patriots.
Legal charges still pending and you have to wonder if this is the end for Jolly in the NFL. Time, and the legal system, will tell
The NFL needed a hard ass commissioner, love him or hate him, he is consistant. But on this issue the CBA is clear, fail multiple drug tests and you sit a year. Not sure this situation constitutes saying "Goodell Swings the Hammer".
There has been no league report of a failed drug test. As far as anyone can currently ascertain, this involves his criminal case. If it is about a failed test, it's still Goodell swinging the hammer, though, so I don't really see where you were going with your post.
That consistency didn't really manifest itself after Mangini admitted to taping from the endzones, now did it?
Its been reported as substance abuse not related to his trial.
Jolly's suspension is for substance abuse | ProFootballTalk.com
edit: I didn't read done further to see that you posted the substance abuse policy.
So there was my point the CBA says that if you fail multiple drug tests you get suspended for a year. The commish suspended him for a year, and now there are reports that it is indefinite. I don't see that as the comish swinging a hammer, if anyone swung the hammer it was Jolly.
You are going to have to clue me on that one. I don't remember Mangini admitting to that. I remember the TV captures from the Jets game purportedly showing a Jets employee with a camera on the sideline. But nothing about Mangini admitting that.
So what's the problem?
A league rule prohibits teams from using a video camera on the sidelines for any purpose. In the Jets' case, they were filming from the end zone.
So what's the problem?
You are going to have to clue me on that one. I don't remember Mangini admitting to that. I remember the TV captures from the Jets game purportedly showing a Jets employee with a camera on the sideline. But nothing about Mangini admitting that.
So what's the problem?
| 12 | 963 |
| 25 | 3K |
| 55 | 3K |
| 14 | 660 |
| 12 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










