varjao
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 6,544
- Reaction score
- 6,227
IMO it's kind of a red flag to have a 29 year old QB and everyone's still making his case based on potential. He's solidly into what should be the prime of his career, and at this point he probably is what he is - after the injuries, you could even say it's optimistic to hope he'll get back to what he was.
And to be clear, what he was is a very good quarterback, and even in his current state he's a good quarterback, but it's not a generational talent and no-brain HOFer like everyone said he'd be from his junior year at Stanford onward.
At this point in his career, I think it's 50/50 whether he or Matt Ryan has more productive years in front of them as an NFL QB, and Ryan is more accomplished and less of an injury risk. So that's the conversation I think Luck belongs in - with the Matt Ryans and Matt Staffords of the world, aka the good quarterbacks who nobody seriously considers to be the best of their peers, let alone a QB of any historic significance.
Agree, that's a showcase of a talented guy ruined by a terrible franchise. I can't help but think that in the right situation he would be in the Russel Wilson conversation, Carlson Wentz apparently is headed to that same tier.
Now he is ruined beyond the point of no return. He should demand a trade.