Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:NFL.com


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:Providence Journal

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: N/A
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Point Proven
The critics have blasted them all season, but Sunday night the Patriots defense proved that they really are better than people think.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

@ryjacques U watch stupid. they pay nfl because you watch. so stop watching. do us both a favor.

@rtmcnamara @ryjacques Then why you writing to me? I didn't write u.

@ricked82 Not that I've heard of. I doubt it.

👀👀👀👀 this was my show back in the day lol https://t.co/PRT0rWrFqm

@PeterIBreen it's weird because he knows football. Just a strange blind spot

@ricked82 By every statistical measure, any analytic, Ryan and Brady were 1-2 this season.

RT @MiamiHEAT: #HEATwin ! Your @MiamiHEAT defeat the Golden State Warriors 105-102 for their 4th consecutive victory! #HEATwin https://t.c…

RT @PlayersTribune: "Pats fans y’all are spoiled. Yeah, I said it. Spoiled. Winning will do that." https://t.co/PFxrazZJfH

@MarcusPapas he whiffed on at least back-to-back plays, but I haven't gotten there yet

Did you know that Mike was asked to coach? 92. ... 93. ... https://t.co/F4wsYrzaS0

Patriots knew exactly how Steelers would react, to the point that Edelman never stopped moving, started walking to new spot.

RT @SportsCenter: Tom Brady is on the cover for ESPN The Magazine's Super Bowl Preview Issue. https://t.co/u5NKMkgtbw

That was the Patriots toying with, out-coaching the Steelers. One team was playing chess, other checkers.

PIT had something cooking when out of I form, 11 went in motion (staple play). Then Brady audibled Jordan & NE went spread, 26y pass to 15

I have just the book for you FromDarknesstoDynasty https://t.co/bPawT2pkag

RT @michaelFhurley: "He's fat and slow and sucks when there's penetration or he doesn't have a huge hole." 😂😂😂 https://t.co/dUF1ub3lbh

RT @Chron_MattYoung: Here's Danny Amendola when he was at The Woodlands. Now, he's headed back home for the Super Bowl. https://t.co/nS0i2R…

I don't mean to like Corinne. She's a hot mess. But that confrontation with Taylor won me over. And the nudity https://t.co/2kiVVutLf8

RT @KevinShockey: This is a GREAT video... Cab driver says John Elway is best QB of all time, didn't know he was IN the cab! https://t.co/T…

RT @ZackCoxNESN: Super Bowl LI will be a homecoming for several Patriots players. Here's what they looked like as high schoolers:


OT: Chargers Extend Danny Woodhead

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by mayoclinic, Jul 23, 2014.

  1. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    220
    Ratings:
    +1,335
    OK
     
  2. Kasmir

    Kasmir Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +28
    Brady lasted to the 6th round. What's your point?
     
  3. RayClay

    RayClay Hall of Fame Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    25,015
    Likes Received:
    2,202
    Ratings:
    +8,647
    He was still drafted. Do you think there was some conspiracy to not draft the better athlete?
     
  4. Kasmir

    Kasmir Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +28
    I don't understand your conspiracy point. You think I think there was a conspiracy? I think, as with Brady, 32 teams made a mistake. Certainly not because of his measurables. I would guess becaues he played at Chadron State in Division II and was small.

    More interesting is why folks like you continue to claim that he is an inferior athlete to Vereen. What's up with that? Their relative draft order tells you that?
     
  5. RayClay

    RayClay Hall of Fame Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    25,015
    Likes Received:
    2,202
    Ratings:
    +8,647

    You said he was clearly a better athlete than someone taken in the second round. I didn't say anything about him as an athlete. I think Vereen has more upside as a receiver, so take that any way you want.
     
  6. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    The thing is the Pats use Vereen and Woodhead differently. Vereen is used more in the passing game split out where Woodhead always lines up in the backfield. Hard to get a carry if you are split out wide. Last year Vereen had less receiving yards (427) in 8 games than Woodhead had in his best year with the Pats playing 16 games. Both career high receiving TDs for a season is 3 (again Vereen did it in 8 games and Woodhead did it in 16).

    You cannot just pick rushing stats to compare the two. The Pats used Woodhead like they did with Faulk. The Pats are trying to make Vereen into a Darren Sproles clone. If you look at Sproles rushing stats in a vacuum without looking at his receiving stats, you would say he is a below average RB because he never had 603 yards rushing or 3 rushing TDs in a season. You combine his receiving stats with the rushing stats and you see he is/was one of the best RBs in the league.

    To compare Woodhead and Vereen just based on how they play when Brady handed off the ball is not a fair comparison.

    Again, I said that Woodhead was a huge loss last year, but I think Vereen is a far better player when healthy. His problem is health.
     
  7. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    I never said he was an exceptional player, but you may need to watch the Bills game again. The guy rushed 14 times for 101 yards for a whopping 7.2 YPC (and his longest rush was 21 yards so it wasn't like he rushed for 2-3 yards on most rushes and broke one for 70 yards). He also had 7 catches for 58 yards. Not that you can do it this way. But if he had this type of performance every game for a 16 game season, he would have gotten 1616 yards rushing and 928 yards receiving. He would be a leading candidate for league MVP with those numbers even without the TDs.

    As for the bad drops, the guy broke his wrist and he said even early this offseason that he was still recovering from it.
     
  8. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    I am not overrating him at all. Edelman replaced Welker's production for the most part. They had no one who could really replace Woodhead last year at least for the 8 games that Vereen was out. Now if Vereen didn't go down and was healthy for most of the year, I would have a different take on this.

    I have already said that Vereen is a better player than Woodhead. But last year, Woodhead is worlds better than the guy who filled in for Vereen while he was on in season IR.

    I am not overrating Woodhead at all. Woodhead's loss was huge in large part because Vereen was expected to replace his production and Vereen missed half the season and spent much of the time after he came back significantly less than 100%.

    For all the talk of Welker. I don't think the Pats missed him all that much. They had a very productive slot receiver last year. What they were missing were other pieces. Mostly Gronk. But another big loss was a third down/change of pace RB that was missing for more than half the season. The Pats have always used these types of RBs (Faulk, Woodhead, Vereen) more than most.
     
  9. Brady6

    Brady6 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,751
    Ratings:
    +5,715
    He played for a small school against lesser competition. In addition, he did not have a designated position, some saw him as a WR others a RB and his size was a major concern.
     
  10. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    It is funny in one thread, I am accused of overrating Woodhead by the Pro Vereen crowd and overrating Vereen by the Pro Woodhead crowd. Maybe I should try to become a contrarian poster, I guess I do it pretty well. Everyone disagrees with me.
     
  11. PatsFan2

    PatsFan2 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,327
    Likes Received:
    332
    Ratings:
    +1,257
    I say this rigth now Woodhead > Vereen! anybody who wants to debate that at this time have alot of time on their hands.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2014
  12. Mike the Brit

    Mike the Brit Minuteman Target PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,173
    Likes Received:
    948
    Ratings:
    +2,843
    I've watched it and I've seen the stats. Football Outsiders has DVOA. I'm not able to do that, but let's just say that the big (positive) plays came from Amendola and Edelman. Ridley in the first half looked special (until he fumbled!) Vereen looked like a competent third-down back but not a scary threat. (And Blount, in that game, looked terrible.)
     
  13. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    The guy had 158 all purpose yards and you are saying he looked like a competent third down back?

    Again, I have never said that Vereen was Darren Sproles. I said that is how they want to use him in that mold.

    But Woodhead was never a scary threat either. Part of what made Woodhead so effective is that he caught defenses off guard with a delayed draw or a direct snap or a screen in the flat.

    I don't get why Vereen has to be "scary threat" or an "exceptional player" to be better than Woodhead. I love Woodhead as a player, but he was and always will be more of a complimentary player than a primary threat. Even with San Diego he was the third down/change of pace RB. That is what Vereen is too.
     
  14. SalemPats

    SalemPats In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,601
    Likes Received:
    571
    Ratings:
    +2,142
    good for woodhead, i'm happy for him
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. condon84

    condon84 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    5,245
    Likes Received:
    280
    Ratings:
    +1,247
    I love Vereen's potential, but I preferred Woodhead's dependability and consistent production when he was on the field.

    Dude was a gamer and super competitive. Reminded me of Kevin Faulk in that regard.
     
  16. RayClay

    RayClay Hall of Fame Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    25,015
    Likes Received:
    2,202
    Ratings:
    +8,647
    I am not pro anything. I just think Woodhead is a fine, small player who is good, but not outstanding, as both a runner and receiver.

    There's nothing wrong with being a good, dependable all around player in my opinion. I laughed when I swiped your quote, but it was a quote and i knew I was going to get skewered for implying that Woodhead wasn't the greatest thing since bacon wrapped bacon.

    Sorry to stick you into the middle of this, but it's fun to be a contrarian once in a while. Passes the time til we see some damn games, anyway.
     
  17. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    220
    Ratings:
    +1,335
    But you will anyway.

    Hell, if LaGarrette Blount rushed for 189 yards and scored 4 TD's every game he'd have 3024 yards and 64 TD's.

    How about mentioning the other seven games in which Vereen rushed 30 times for 107 yards for a whopping 3.5 yards per carry?
     
  18. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    220
    Ratings:
    +1,335
    Do you think Woodhead never played in the slot or split out wide?
     
  19. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    Don't put words in my mouth. I said in another thread that Shane Vereen is a change of pace/third down back. I am responding to a post where he didn't look exceptional in the Bills game and I expanded his stats from that game to a 16 game schedule to prove a point. I never thought Vereen or any RB would put those numbers up for a 16 game schedule.

    And again, Vereen is more than a rusher. He is a receiver who spreads out wide on a lot of plays. He is an all purpose back rather than more of a rusher.
     
  20. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39,268
    Likes Received:
    3,885
    Ratings:
    +16,155
    Not nearly as much as Vereen. Vereen is used more in the passing game than Woodhead was. If you cannot see that the Pats use/used Vereen and Woodhead very differently in the offenses, I guess we cannot have much of a conversation.
     

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER