Good post Cousin, The Draft value chart has #23 and #11 at 1950 points. Our #3 is 2200 points. Would the Pats, when they come back from vacation this week, Take #11 and #23 for the #3 pick if the Vikes spun one of their fourths like pick #108?
We are closer in points to a top three pick from them than Washington or the Bears for that matter. The Bears are also in their division.
I think most on this Forum would opt for this deal. We need a slew of picks in this Draft as our front office is sleep walking through FA. and deserve an "F". We are forced to play rookies.....like Green Bay...hmm.
Your post makes a lot of sense. Until the "Take a QB at #3" posters can guarantee that the "Holy Three" are that much more viable as a "franchise QB (see Trey Lance. See Bryce Young), I would take my chances of the so called second tier (Mahomes was 10th) None of these kids will start in 2024 anyway. We are starting if ranked, the worst QB in the NFL in 2024 instead.
Great job FO. You guys have created this issue for years in Draft and FA choices and have escaped criticism Mr. Wolf and Mr. Groh, and blamed this all on BB? He was the final say so shame on him, but it was you ....and yes Fields haters I would take a 6th (or this 4th) and trade with the Bears for Fields. I would rather have an ascending QB than a career backup just to make 2024 a little bit exciting. If AVP worked with Watson who has run characteristics, perhaps he could finish molding Fields. At least it would be exciting to watch as our new multi-million dollar clip board holders on the sideline show off their clean uniforms in 2024.
What a trajedy it would be if Fields wound up as really good here. What would we do...what would we do...
DW Toys