Keegs
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2006
- Messages
- 4,942
- Reaction score
- 12
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's even better than that. The mod locked the thread, but only after posting this:
So, the Jets didn't "cheat" because the PR guy FROM THE JETS, a team that lied about filming until just now coming clean, says so, and that's a good enough reason to end all discussion.
Letterman wishes his writers were this funny. What a tool of a moderator.
NFL rules state "no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches' booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game." They also say all video for coaching .purposes must be shot from locations "enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead."
Bunch of fraud hypocrites. kleckoisgod is a cowardly piece of ****. I used to post there a lot but haven't even bothered this season, because what's the point? There's not much of a rivalry when the only team that bunch of losers can beat is the winless fish.
I'm a little grumpy today, I sense a JI ban coming on...
I read the rule when this first became news. As I recall, you have your enclosed boxes where you can tape. Now, "asking permission," or "from the sidelines", never came into it. It is true that the taping had to be done in designated enclosed areas -- but the sidelines are no more or less enclosed than a random spot in the stands. If the spot is in the enclosed "coaches' box," nobody would ask permission. They'd just film.
You have official game cameras that are the same for every club. Then you apparently have these "tapes by permission" you can make outside of the enclosure. Nobody rats anybody out, no harm no foul.
So evidently, the rules are hard and fast if you rat, and flexible if you don't think the other guy will rat.
We "cheated." I don't care about saying it. The rule said one thing and we did another.
This is just the proof that everybody "cheats", and that the "asterisks" don't apply to anybody any game or any thing in the real world, when the subject is something as minor as this. More than anything I am pissed at mediots buying in and explaining how "huge" an advantage the Pats got... well, what kind of "huge" advantage is it now that crap teams are getting caught?
PFnV
Bunch of fraud hypocrites. kleckoisgod is a cowardly piece of ****. I used to post there a lot but haven't even bothered this season, because what's the point? There's not much of a rivalry when the only team that bunch of losers can beat is the winless fish.
I'm a little grumpy today, I sense a JI ban coming on...
"I love the smell of Kool-Aid in the morning, that fruit-punch smell. It smells like... victory "Bunch of fraud hypocrites. kleckoisgod is a cowardly piece of ****. I used to post there a lot but haven't even bothered this season, because what's the point? There's not much of a rivalry when the only team that bunch of losers can beat is the winless fish.
I'm a little grumpy today, I sense a JI ban coming on...
Scurrying like Rats trying to come up with answers,aka excuses.I wonder what Peter King, Cris Collinsworth, and Bob Costas think of all this? Greg Easterbrook, where are you?
Even if they don't whack the Jets for a first rounder, the NFL definitely needs to put an asterisk next to their 3-10 record. :rocker:
Article in tommorrow's Newsday.
http://www.newsday.com/sports/football/jets/ny-spjets1212,0,3978329.story
Actually, you write about what you feel will sell advertising space/time.Modern journalism school is NOT about investigative journalism and a search for facts; it's about agenda journalism. You write what you feel is right.
Even if they don't whack the Jets for a first rounder, the NFL definitely needs to put an asterisk next to their 3-10 record. :rocker:
Cousins,
The Jest deal ripped open the scab. This is all baloney this taping stuff. As kids we all played in a used refrigerator or furniture cardboard large box packaging if we found them, and made them forts or castles.
NFL rules state "no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches' booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game." They also say all video for coaching .purposes must be shot from locations "enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead."
If the kid who "taped" the Jets on the sidelines was in one of those boxes it would have been legal. All of you sanctimonious N.E. haters have to feel pretty stupid even suggesting that the Pats hurt the integrity of the sport (take note Martin Luther Dungy!).......please!!!!
Just because he didn't use a cardboard refrigerator packaging box? This is how stupid this has become. We could have taped the signals from underneath the "Amana" porch. That was legal!!!!!!!!! It's just where we taped them from. Maybe BB was trying to convince Goodell that we were really on the patio? And then we have nut-case people paying for airplanes to circle overhead with banners. What smart(?) person in the media picks this up and says.....Opps! My bad on this "spygate" crap! first? He will then have a following of "writers" or mediots distancing themselves from this taping or cheating B.S. like they would the girl in the "kissing booth" at the county fair with a lip fungus.
How do you like your crow Mr. Media and Mr. McNabb and Mr. Horn and Mr. Dungy, and Mr. Tomlin and Mr. NY Post and Mr. "airplane banner buyer" and Mr. or Ms. every fan out there in "lets hate'em" land? Pretty niftly stuff....huh!
DW Toys
Of course, the fact that the Jets are STILL doing this, playing the irrelevant "permission" card...
| 31 | 981 |
| 7 | 570 |
| 17 | 1K |
| 328 | 18K |
| 11 | 474 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)











