Metaphors
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Messages
- 3,670
- Reaction score
- 0
As a minor quibble, I'd say that it's Warren-Wilfork-Pryor/Wright, with no clear starter among the latter two (Wright did play close to twice the number of snaps).
Have no problem with that. I see Wright's role primarily when the Pats are in sub packages, so I was hesitant to call him the base 3-4 starter since that would effectively make him an every down guy. Really doesn't change my point since I would like to see both Pryor and Wright as situational guys / spot starters.
I thought both Pryor and Wright did very well in their roles last year. Getting someone that allows them to stay in those roles (maybe more snaps, but not new responsibilities) is a good thing. So in my mind, the Pats are set at 4 of the 6 DL positions. If Brace develops in year 2, it can be 5 of 6. That is why I'm more inclined to go with an evolutionary approach with Odrick than a revolutionary approach with Cody/Wilfork to DE.











