PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Mayoclinic Thoughts

mayoclinic

PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
21,674
Reaction score
13,788
I haven't posted since 2015, when the NFL suspended Tom Brady for the Ideal Gas Law. I decided that the Sinaloa and Cali cartels were more deserving of support than the one that calls itself the NFL. Haven't watched much since then and don't follow as closely. Lurk once in a while.

I haven't followed the draft discussion on the board very actively, but FWIW, here are a few thoughts:

General Thoughts

1. Every draft is different, there are opportunities and mistakes to be made every year. This one is thin at the top but very, very deep. If I compare this year's pool to last year's, last year had a strong top 25, but this year has quality going out at least mid-day 3. There will be hall of fame players to come out of this draft; they may be as likely to come day 2 or even 3 as day 1.

2. The draft every year tends to follow a pattern: the mediot hype machine ramps into overdrive, and everyone buys into the hype. People salivate over "can't miss" prospects. Some NFL teams buy into the hype; for others, their GMs and Scouts do their own work, and the draft inevitably veers off course, and the mediots try to correct on the fly. "Generational" and "can't miss" prospects often turn out to be far less, and gems sneak through the cracks.

3. Last year was pretty easy. The Pats desperately needed a QB, had the #3 pick, and there were 3 top ones. I personally had Drake Maye rated as my favorite QB prospect since Andrew Luck, and was thrilled. Many considered him a "boom or bust" prospect. That alone made it a great draft. I thought the Pats tried to fill needs much too much, and ignored values. In particular, I had a top 25 grade on Cooper De Jean and was screaming when he slipped to day 2.

4. I generally rate trajectory and traits above productivity. The latter is important, but so much depends on how a player is used, what they are asked to do, and how they are coached. Look at Nick Scourton at Purdue vs. Texas A&M, for example.

5. I am a build around the lines guy. All positions are important and have value, but other than QB I value line prospects (both OL and DL) over all others, and "playmakers" probably less than other positions, just based on the number of opportunities they have to impact a play. I would never, for example, have taken Ja'Marr Chase over Penei Sewell in 2021 - both were great players, but for me the lineman would be my choice to build my team.

The 2025 Draft

1. This draft for me is all about 1 player: Josh Simmons. The Pats need a LT like they needed a QB in 2024, and I rate a healthy Simmons above Joe Alt (2024 #5), Ola Fashanu (2024 #10), Paris Johnson (2023 #6), Andrew Thomas (2020 #4), Rashawn Slater (2021 #13), Ikem Ekwonu (2022 #4) and Charles Cross (2022 #8). For me, the sine qua non for a dominant LT is their footwork and movement skills, and Simmons shines. His 10" hands are a great asset. He needs to get stronger and meaner, and there are maturity questions, but for me a healthy Josh Simmons would be a no-brainer for me at #4. Patellar tendon is a nasty injury, but if his medicals check out, I'd take him at #4 over anyone else, though I'd prefer a trade back to the 7-10 range. I'm convinced he will come off the board in the to 20 picks, with San Francisco (11), Dallas (12), and Arizona (16) as possible landing spots. He's that good. Take Simmons with your 1st pick, and then let the draft come to you. In my first mock (pre-Bowl Games, Combines, and FA), I had the Pats trading back from #4 to #9 and #40 with NO (for Abdul Carter, no less, as at that point I had Shedeur Sanders going top 3) and then trading back up into the 1st with the #38 and #40 picks.

2. I would NOT spend a top 10 pick on Will Campbell or Armand Membou. I'd gladly trade #50 and #173 to move up to #48 for Campbell (shades of 2001), but top 10 to me is ridiculous. The rumor mill is that the Pats love him and will mostly likely take him at #4, but I will personally barf if that happens. Membou is very athletic but raw and immature. I don't think he will make a great LT.

3. The hype machine is all over Travis Hunter and Ahmed Carter. I have questions about both. Hunter has unbelievable vision, ball skills, and endurance, but he has questions about positional fit and durability as a pro. Carter has tremendous burst, but he has only 1 year of experience as an edge rusher, is mainly a speed demon, and has had shoulder and foot injuries.

4. Ashton Jeanty is pound for pound the best and safest player in this draft. He will be an All Pro. The question is for how many years? No one would hesitate if he had a 10 year career, but by the end of his 1st contract will he be too beat up to still be an impact player?

5. I love the versatility of Jalon Walker and Tyler Warren. Not my first options at #4, but I would take either over Campbell/Membou, as I have them graded much higher. My top 7 players look something Like Hunter, Carter, Walker, Warren, Graham, Jeanty and Simmons. I would probably take Josh Conerly over Campbell and Membou as a pure LT prospect.

6. I don't see many good LT prospects slip to #38, so it's either take one at #4 (or with a trade back) or trade up. Donovan Jackson seems to be falling through the cracks. He filled in well at LT for Ohio St. and got better quickly. He's not a pure LT, but he could probably upgrade the position and then be moved inside in a year or 2. I'd consider him at #38 if available even if we go OT in the 1st round.

7. Other guys who I like in the 1st and would consider trading up for if we went OL with #4 (or a trade down): Jalon Walker, Tyler Warren, Shemar Stewart, Walter Nolen, Colston Loveland, Jihaad Campbell, Derrick Harmon. I'd look to see who slips. This will be a very subjective trade, and the order from 12-40 is totally up in the air. Some guys will slip, possibly even to day 2.

8. Guys I like day 2 if available: Donovan Jackson, Mason Taylor, Elijah Arroyo, Luther Burden,
 
 
(OP Continued)

8. Guys I like day 2 top 50 if available: Donovan Jackson, Mason Taylor, Elijah Arroyo, Luther Burden. Maybe Nic Scourton.

9. Guys I'm really intrigued by in the 50-100 range: Oluwafemi Odadejo, Alfred Collins, Savion Williams, Jaylin Noel. A clever coordinator could do so much with these guys.

10. Guys who I'd love if they slipped to day 3: Andrew Mukuba, Jeffrey Bassa, Harold Fannin.

There are LOTS of other guys I like and would be happy with. So much depth at RB, WR, EDGE, DL, CB.

11. Guys who I don't grade as highly as the media seems to have them: Will Campbell, Armand Membou, Tetairoa McMillan, Matthew Golden, Emeka Egbuka. None bad players, I just don't have them graded as highly as I think they will probably go.

There was more, but I forget.
 
The 2025 Draft

1. This draft for me is all about 1 player: Josh Simmons. The Pats need a LT like they needed a QB in 2024, and I rate a healthy Simmons above Joe Alt (2024 #5), Ola Fashanu (2024 #10), Paris Johnson (2023 #6), Andrew Thomas (2020 #4), Rashawn Slater (2021 #13), Ikem Ekwonu (2022 #4) and Charles Cross (2022 #8). For me, the sine qua non for a dominant LT is their footwork and movement skills, and Simmons shines. His 10" hands are a great asset. He needs to get stronger and meaner, and there are maturity questions, but for me a healthy Josh Simmons would be a no-brainer for me at #4. Patellar tendon is a nasty injury, but if his medicals check out, I'd take him at #4 over anyone else, though I'd prefer a trade back to the 7-10 range. I'm convinced he will come off the board in the to 20 picks, with San Francisco (11), Dallas (12), and Arizona (16) as possible landing spots. He's that good. Take Simmons with your 1st pick, and then let the draft come to you. In my first mock (pre-Bowl Games, Combines, and FA), I had the Pats trading back from #4 to #9 and #40 with NO (for Abdul Carter, no less, as at that point I had Shedeur Sanders going top 3) and then trading back up into the 1st with the #38 and #40 picks.


This please. Thank you, welcome back
 
I haven't posted since 2015, when the NFL suspended Tom Brady for the Ideal Gas Law. I decided that the Sinaloa and Cali cartels were more deserving of support than the one that calls itself the NFL. Haven't watched much since then and don't follow as closely. Lurk once in a while.

I haven't followed the draft discussion on the board very actively, but FWIW, here are a few thoughts:

General Thoughts

1. Every draft is different, there are opportunities and mistakes to be made every year. This one is thin at the top but very, very deep. If I compare this year's pool to last year's, last year had a strong top 25, but this year has quality going out at least mid-day 3. There will be hall of fame players to come out of this draft; they may be as likely to come day 2 or even 3 as day 1.

2. The draft every year tends to follow a pattern: the mediot hype machine ramps into overdrive, and everyone buys into the hype. People salivate over "can't miss" prospects. Some NFL teams buy into the hype; for others, their GMs and Scouts do their own work, and the draft inevitably veers off course, and the mediots try to correct on the fly. "Generational" and "can't miss" prospects often turn out to be far less, and gems sneak through the cracks.

3. Last year was pretty easy. The Pats desperately needed a QB, had the #3 pick, and there were 3 top ones. I personally had Drake Maye rated as my favorite QB prospect since Andrew Luck, and was thrilled. Many considered him a "boom or bust" prospect. That alone made it a great draft. I thought the Pats tried to fill needs much too much, and ignored values. In particular, I had a top 25 grade on Cooper De Jean and was screaming when he slipped to day 2.

4. I generally rate trajectory and traits above productivity. The latter is important, but so much depends on how a player is used, what they are asked to do, and how they are coached. Look at Nick Scourton at Purdue vs. Texas A&M, for example.

5. I am a build around the lines guy. All positions are important and have value, but other than QB I value line prospects (both OL and DL) over all others, and "playmakers" probably less than other positions, just based on the number of opportunities they have to impact a play. I would never, for example, have taken Ja'Marr Chase over Penei Sewell in 2021 - both were great players, but for me the lineman would be my choice to build my team.

The 2025 Draft

1. This draft for me is all about 1 player: Josh Simmons. The Pats need a LT like they needed a QB in 2024, and I rate a healthy Simmons above Joe Alt (2024 #5), Ola Fashanu (2024 #10), Paris Johnson (2023 #6), Andrew Thomas (2020 #4), Rashawn Slater (2021 #13), Ikem Ekwonu (2022 #4) and Charles Cross (2022 #8). For me, the sine qua non for a dominant LT is their footwork and movement skills, and Simmons shines. His 10" hands are a great asset. He needs to get stronger and meaner, and there are maturity questions, but for me a healthy Josh Simmons would be a no-brainer for me at #4. Patellar tendon is a nasty injury, but if his medicals check out, I'd take him at #4 over anyone else, though I'd prefer a trade back to the 7-10 range. I'm convinced he will come off the board in the to 20 picks, with San Francisco (11), Dallas (12), and Arizona (16) as possible landing spots. He's that good. Take Simmons with your 1st pick, and then let the draft come to you. In my first mock (pre-Bowl Games, Combines, and FA), I had the Pats trading back from #4 to #9 and #40 with NO (for Abdul Carter, no less, as at that point I had Shedeur Sanders going top 3) and then trading back up into the 1st with the #38 and #40 picks.

2. I would NOT spend a top 10 pick on Will Campbell or Armand Membou. I'd gladly trade #50 and #173 to move up to #48 for Campbell (shades of 2001), but top 10 to me is ridiculous. The rumor mill is that the Pats love him and will mostly likely take him at #4, but I will personally barf if that happens. Membou is very athletic but raw and immature. I don't think he will make a great LT.

3. The hype machine is all over Travis Hunter and Ahmed Carter. I have questions about both. Hunter has unbelievable vision, ball skills, and endurance, but he has questions about positional fit and durability as a pro. Carter has tremendous burst, but he has only 1 year of experience as an edge rusher, is mainly a speed demon, and has had shoulder and foot injuries.

4. Ashton Jeanty is pound for pound the best and safest player in this draft. He will be an All Pro. The question is for how many years? No one would hesitate if he had a 10 year career, but by the end of his 1st contract will he be too beat up to still be an impact player?

5. I love the versatility of Jalon Walker and Tyler Warren. Not my first options at #4, but I would take either over Campbell/Membou, as I have them graded much higher. My top 7 players look something Like Hunter, Carter, Walker, Warren, Graham, Jeanty and Simmons. I would probably take Josh Conerly over Campbell and Membou as a pure LT prospect.

6. I don't see many good LT prospects slip to #38, so it's either take one at #4 (or with a trade back) or trade up. Donovan Jackson seems to be falling through the cracks. He filled in well at LT for Ohio St. and got better quickly. He's not a pure LT, but he could probably upgrade the position and then be moved inside in a year or 2. I'd consider him at #38 if available even if we go OT in the 1st round.

7. Other guys who I like in the 1st and would consider trading up for if we went OL with #4 (or a trade down): Jalon Walker, Tyler Warren, Shemar Stewart, Walter Nolen, Colston Loveland, Jihaad Campbell, Derrick Harmon. I'd look to see who slips. This will be a very subjective trade, and the order from 12-40 is totally up in the air. Some guys will slip, possibly even to day 2.

8. Guys I like day 2 if available: Donovan Jackson, Mason Taylor, Elijah Arroyo, Luther Burden,
Im glad you decided to come back, i missed your analysis
 
Mayo clinic, Manxman, patchick . . . a true reunion of the draft forum legends! Good year.
I think its because they sense that things have changed with the team in a positive way. The pats now have competent leadership.
 
I think its because they sense that things have changed with the team in a positive way. The pats now have competent leadership.
In part and also I became really frustrated with BB’s drafts. They weren’t fun. Now I feel like I can worry less about random DBs drafted in the 2nd round, WRs guaranteed to fail (although last year wasn’t a good sign we’ll see improvement there) and two-gapping DLs.
 
Welcome back. Always great to have more people talking the draft and it's prospects.

I like Josh Simmons a lot. I still remember back when USC was recruiting him out of San Diego. Surprised at how high he's risen given what was said about him as a recruit. But thats the nature of linemen.

But i just can't get on board with your valuation of him. If he did what he did in 5 games all year(and against elite comp the rest of the way), I'd understand it. But you have 5 games of stand out play, against an easy schedule. I'm not saying to ignore that, but if trajectory is your thing, then a guy like Conerly who continued his ascent all year as the year went on, should he top tier as well. But on top of that, you have the injury. Even if he is healthy, there is a good chance he doesn't have the same athleticism and agility. That doesn't make him the same player. What if he misses the 1st half of the season? He was suppose to have a private workout, but didn't. What if he misses the first half AND isn't as good as before? McShay says he's heard no talk of top 20, nd then didn't mock him in the 1st round at all. Maybe someone does take the leap of faith and gambles, because of limited upside in others. Maybe those teams are keeping their plans extremely quiet. Who knows. But I just don't see the justification of taking him at 4, or in the top 10. Just way too risky.

If he's available via trade down or up in the mid/late first, I'm fine with the gamble because you've added extra assets on top of it.
 
In part and also I became really frustrated with BB’s drafts. They weren’t fun. Now I feel like I can worry less about random DBs drafted in the 2nd round, WRs guaranteed to fail (although last year wasn’t a good sign we’ll see improvement there) and two-gapping DLs.
I’m with you on BBs drafts they drove me crazy, i lost it when he traded down to take cole strange. I didn’t watch the rest of that draft i was so pissed off, and i hadn’t missed a draft since 1977.
 
I’m with you on BBs drafts they drove me crazy, i lost it when he traded down to take cole strange. I didn’t watch the rest of that draft i was so pissed off, and i hadn’t missed a draft since 1977.
I drank the kool-aid initially, starting in 2011, but as time wore on, it just became more and more frustrating.
 
I certainly didn't expect universal agreement. Different people/teams have different risk tolerances. I am comfortable taking Simmons at #4 if his medicals check out. I am not comfortable reaching for a player who I don't grade nearly that high, such as Campbell or Membou. Simmons has a chance to be worth the #4 pick. They do not, in any projection, for me.

There is a double standard in the media regarding injuries. People are drooling over Abdul Carter, but he didn't work out at the Combine or his Pro Day, and has dealt with both shoulder and foot injuries. The latter in particular can be lingering. I don't know the medicals on either player, but one seems to be treated differently than the other.
 
I certainly didn't expect universal agreement. Different people/teams have different risk tolerances. I am comfortable taking Simmons at #4 if his medicals check out. I am not comfortable reaching for a player who I don't grade nearly that high, such as Campbell or Membou. Simmons has a chance to be worth the #4 pick. They do not, in any projection, for me.

There is a double standard in the media regarding injuries. People are drooling over Abdul Carter, but he didn't work out at the Combine or his Pro Day, and has dealt with both shoulder and foot injuries. The latter in particular can be lingering. I don't know the medicals on either player, but one seems to be treated differently than the other.
I don’t spend much time checking out prospects anymore, i get my info from people such as yourself manx, bgc etc. I have never viewed campbell as being worthy of the #4 pick. I wouldn’t be disappointed if they took hunter or carter, if those two were gone i would trade down, if we can. If not take the bpa in an area of need.
 
Last edited:
I certainly didn't expect universal agreement. Different people/teams have different risk tolerances. I am comfortable taking Simmons at #4 if his medicals check out. I am not comfortable reaching for a player who I don't grade nearly that high, such as Campbell or Membou. Simmons has a chance to be worth the #4 pick. They do not, in any projection, for me.

There is a double standard in the media regarding injuries. People are drooling over Abdul Carter, but he didn't work out at the Combine or his Pro Day, and has dealt with both shoulder and foot injuries. The latter in particular can be lingering. I don't know the medicals on either player, but one seems to be treated differently than the other.
The nature of the injuries aren't in the same realm, that's why they're viewed differently.

Even if Carter has foot surgery now, he's still going to be ready for game 1. The shoulder has been checked out multiple times and surgery isn't needed. Hes gone through medicals and he hasn't had surgery. That tells people something. But, they're also injuries that generally have expected returns to full ability.

Simmons injury has been one that has long term impacts on guys, and nobody knows where he's at. Even if he heals on course, he may not be the same player. If he heals on course, he's probably out most of the first half of the season. The uncertainty absolutely raises red flags.

You don't need to see the medicals to know why they're viewed differently.
 
We all hated BB's drafts. Brilliance and insanity intertwined. How one could possibly grade Jermaine Cunningham over Carlos Dunlap, or consider Ron Brace or Jordan Richards worthy of 2nd round picks, is beyond me.

Drafting is hard. Even the best miss 50% of the time or more, and it's different in real time. Mike Mayock was the smartest analyst around for years, and look at his 1st round picks - 5 no less in 3 years - for the Raiders:

2019 #4 - DE Clelin Ferrell
2019 #24 - RB Josh Jacobs
2020 #12 - WR Henry Ruggs
2020 #19 - CB Damon Arnette
2021 #17 - OL Alex Leatherwood

What a colossal waste of tremendous draft resources. But he did pick Maxx Crosby at #106 in 2019.
 
I don’t spend much time checking out prospects anymore, i get my info from people such as yourself manx, bgc etc. I have never viewed campbell as being worthy of the #4 pick. I wouldn’t be disappointed if they took hunter or carter, if those two were gone i would trade down.
The million $ question though, is, who do you take at 4 if you can't trade down?

We've been discussing that for months. I think 99%, if not 100%, agree trading down is the option we want. But you can't make a team trade up.

You have to pick someone at 4.
 
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Patriots News 03-29, Mock Draft 1.0, Tight End Draft Profiles
Back
Top