I was thinking about this debate last night and I finally ended up putting Carter/Hunter above Graham based upon a thought experiment that I want to run by you.
Imagine all three players play up to their full potential (for this thought experiment I'm imagining Hunter as a full time CB who gets 15-20 snaps per game on offense).
If all three players play to their full potential, in five years time are you more likely too:
1. Having drafted Mason Graham be disappointed watching Carter/Hunter's production on other teams.
2. Having drafted Carter/Hunter be disappointed watching Graham's production on other teams.
For me it's clearly number one which is why I'm taking both before Graham. Now that doesn't mean I've soured on Graham because I haven't, I'd be very happy if he was the pick at 4. But whereas before I had viewed all three equally, I now have some clear space between Carter/Hunter and Graham.