PaulNEPats
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 1,215
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Patters said:He did, but overall I think the Jets look pretty good. I sure hope our secondary looks as good as theirs.
onegameatatime said:Blew the final kickoff return.
New coach, same old moron Jests.
PaulNEPats said:Going for it on 4th and a long 2 on a 16 play drive? And they end up with nothing. Now the colts drive and get a field goal to go up by 3. Nice call Eric!
PatsWorldChamps said:please put OT in the subject of a non-patriots thread
I'm watching the replay in slow motion: the Jets are working out of a 3 TE set with a FB moving around and settling into an "I" formation - the play action worked to suck Colts' players up, but the TE got hung up by sticking with the block of the DE, to point of an uncalled holding penalty, before he started out into his pattern - his delay allowed the defense to recover from the play action (Boiman (sp?) was inside and would have been well behind the TE if he had chipped and gone into his pattern).Oswlek said:Going for it can be backed, but the play call was pretty bad. Play action is less likely to be bought when Indy just stuffed them a couple times in a row, plus the rollout was odd. I just saw the play again from the QB perspective, the only receiver on that side of the field is the TE, who was the target. When Pennington rolled, though, he took two or three defenders with him, so the play had no chance of working.
I still think they should have done play action on an earlier down.
PaulNEPats said:Going for it on 4th and a long 2 on a 16 play drive? And they end up with nothing. Now the colts drive and get a field goal to go up by 3. Nice call Eric!