- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,525
- Reaction score
- 16,306
With regard to DL backup, I would agree that a veteran free agent is a fine solution; ditto for depth at safety. Except for last year, we've always had one or two vets on the DL. I still would want a Day One DL pick, since Hill is certainly no guarantee. Your point is well taken that this year's LB crop may be unusual, and bb may find one that meets our needs.
What is amazing is that this team is in such good shape that we talking about using the draft entirely for depth, after signing Givens or another free agent wideout.
What is amazing is that this team is in such good shape that we talking about using the draft entirely for depth, after signing Givens or another free agent wideout.
rookBoston said:I dont think BB prefers DEs to play LB so much as he likes big, strong, physical players who can engage a offensive lineman and win.
If we draft a player to play LB Day One, I think we both agree that the player will probably be no lighter than 240#, and preferably in the 255# range-- McGinest sized. Claridge is a great case in point: 6-2 254#. That is certainly a criteria for BB in a LB. Generally, that means the player was a DE in college, but that doesnt preclude (IMO) the possibility of a big strong LB.
Recent years, we've had a lot of LBs coming out of college in the 220-235# range-- too light for BB as a LB. The best of last year's crop: Thurman 237#, Tatupu 226#, Morrison 238#. This year, Ernie Sims (220#) for example... the only shot he has to make the Pats roster, as you say, is as a SS. He's the same size as Rodney.
But this year's draft class is different. Look how many top LB prospects are 240# or more: Greenway is 244#, Carpenter is 255#, Havner is 245#, Hawk is 240#, Schlegel is 245#, Parham is 253#. Generally LBs that big are really slow and clunky... but not this year.
Plus, add in the standard crop of DE tweeners: Dumervil is 256#, Lawson is 245#.
Fertile ground this year, and an unquestionable need. Whether a DE tweener or an big college LB.
I agree with all this, but there's no need to use a day one pick for it. Bringing someone onto the roster in free agency-- standard two-year contract-- to provide rotational depth makes more sense to me. Our future is already fairly well established on the DL. Even if we take 4 players on Day One, we'd be better off taking the players at need positions where the need is for youth, or for special level of talent that you cant find in the FA market without breaking the bank.