- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 31,805
- Reaction score
- 39,526
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.they will have 16 away games per year since fans of every opponent will come to vegas to have a drunken blast for the weekend and go watch their team play the raiders
But every game be a sell out.
$$$$$
I thought simply a game of the week in vegas with 2 visiting teams would generate more money than moving a team there
it would be like adding a franchise without the extra team
He doesn't need to. Mark Davis' bowl cut is already haunting him.Hope Al rises from the grave to haunt his ****ty son.
I love the arrogance of NFL owners thinking they can just move teams willy nilly. The Raiders have been in Oakland a long time. They even moved once then changed their minds and realized they had a good thing in Oakland. I am not a fan of the Oakland fan base. It is one of the worst as far as the kind of people. However it is fairly passionate (especially for a west coast fan base). It is not huge but there are smaller teams to move that as less of a staple in their area.
This would not only be bad for football but bad for the owners. If they do it then it will be LA all over again. They will realize after 10 some years they made a mistake when the stadium never gets full and their merchandise sales go down they have made a mistake and will move it back. However how long can you jerk a fan base around before they say screw you and decide to latch on to a more stable team that won't let this crap happen.
That actually sounds like a very good idea. Do you know if this has ever been seriously discussed among the 32?
I thought simply a game of the week in vegas with 2 visiting teams would generate more money than moving a team there
it would be like adding a franchise without the extra team
NO, I repeat NO state or municipality should EVER give a professional sports team a single dime (beyond the normal logistics money you'd spend on any big building site). EVER.For most teams, like the Chargers, I'd agree with you, but I think the Davis family deserves a pass here. They are the least-wealthy family to own an NFL team, with a net worth of ~500 million, and the Raiders represent their only significant asset - they don't even own a majority of the team, though the setup does give them control over it.
The Davis family simply cannot AFFORD to build a stadium without outside money, and the Colosseum is literally falling apart around the team. Since Oakland is uninterested in helping pay for a replacement, and the other owners are likewise uninterested in paying for the new stadium, the Raiders don't have much choice but to move.
Remember when Paul Hornung was suspended for consorting with known gamblers? lol.
NO, I repeat NO state or municipality should EVER give a professional sports team a single dime (beyond the normal logistics money you'd spend on any big building site). EVER.
Kraft showed everyone a working model that didn't cost the state a dime, and they even got the logisics money back from parking fees. If Davis can't afford to build it himself, then the f*cking league and its incredibly deep pockets should front the money. I mean why wouldn't they, if those stadiums were so lucrative. It would be a sound buisiness investment that they should love to get in on.
For decades the criminals at the NFL league offices have practiced legalized extrotion and bribery to get cities to play for stadiums and not ONE ever made finanacial sense and all ended up costing more than the original payment.
I am incredibly proud that the city of Boston and its environs supports 4 great professional teams that play their games in stadia, arenas, and parks that haven't taken a dime out of the city/state coffers to build, upgrade, and maintain.....and they are ALL making money hand over fist.
There should be a criminal investigation of the Nevada Legislature that allowed $750MM to go to this stadium. And don't tell me the money will come from tourist/hotel taxes. That's BS. That's STILL money they could have been spent on infrastructure, education, housing and healthcare, that's going to go to build just an excuse to build luxury boxes and PSL's.
The saddest part of all is that NONE of it is necessary. The NFL makes more than enough money (at least up to now) to self finance a new stadium every 30 years for every franchise in the league. The only reason they take the public money is because they CAN.
The government appointees who oversee U.S. Bank Stadium on behalf of taxpayers get a perk unavailable to most Minnesotans: free tickets to two lower-level luxury suites for all events held there. The suites are for marketing purposes but, they admit, friends and family are often in attendance.
Taxpayers covered almost $500 million of the $1.1 billion cost of the stadium, but the public cannot find out who gets those 36 suite seats each game. The Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority (MSFA) members decline to say who joins them for complimentary food, beer and, in some cases, free parking in the same lot reserved for Vikings players and coaches.
Times have changed and not for the better. Those were the days when a commissioner named Pete Rozelle did not have to talk about integrity. Maybe the best commissioner of any sport ever. During Rozell's reign, six new expansion teams added, not including the merger with AFL that added ten more teams.
Rozell was in charge three times longer than Goodell so far and only had two teams move...when the Raiders and Chargers move, it will be four under Goodell.
NO, I repeat NO state or municipality should EVER give a professional sports team a single dime (beyond the normal logistics money you'd spend on any big building site). EVER.
Kraft showed everyone a working model that didn't cost the state a dime, and they even got the logisics money back from parking fees. If Davis can't afford to build it himself, then the f*cking league and its incredibly deep pockets should front the money. I mean why wouldn't they, if those stadiums were so lucrative. It would be a sound buisiness investment that they should love to get in on.
For decades the criminals at the NFL league offices have practiced legalized extrotion and bribery to get cities to play for stadiums and not ONE ever made finanacial sense and all ended up costing more than the original payment.
I am incredibly proud that the city of Boston and its environs supports 4 great professional teams that play their games in stadia, arenas, and parks that haven't taken a dime out of the city/state coffers to build, upgrade, and maintain.....and they are ALL making money hand over fist.
There should be a criminal investigation of the Nevada Legislature that allowed $750MM to go to this stadium. And don't tell me the money will come from tourist/hotel taxes. That's BS. That's STILL money they could have been spent on infrastructure, education, housing and healthcare, that's going to go to build just an excuse to build luxury boxes and PSL's.
The saddest part of all is that NONE of it is necessary. The NFL makes more than enough money (at least up to now) to self finance a new stadium every 30 years for every franchise in the league. The only reason they take the public money is because they CAN.
I am incredibly proud that the city of Boston and its environs supports 4 great professional teams that play their games in stadia, arenas, and parks that haven't taken a dime out of the city/state coffers to build, upgrade, and maintain.....and they are ALL making money hand over fist.
NO, I repeat NO state or municipality should EVER give a professional sports team a single dime (beyond the normal logistics money you'd spend on any big building site). EVER.
Kraft showed everyone a working model that didn't cost the state a dime, and they even got the logisics money back from parking fees. If Davis can't afford to build it himself, then the f*cking league and its incredibly deep pockets should front the money. I mean why wouldn't they, if those stadiums were so lucrative. It would be a sound buisiness investment that they should love to get in on.
<Snip>
I think your defense of Davis is fair, but I've already stated that the league can make up any short fall that any municipality can put up and do it easily.OK, and so the league refuses, and what exactly is the Davis family supposed to do? Remain in a stadium where the sewage pipes are leaking, and the building itself is falling apart? Sell their 47% share of the team, and watch the new buyer find a city/county/state willing to cough up the money?
In an ideal world, sure, there wouldn't be public money and the league would pay for everything if needed - but in the world we live in, what choice does the Davis family, themselves, have that doesn't end up involving public money? They're the only ones I've defended here.
The thing about Vegas is that there is no region. There is the city and then desert for miles and miles. It's not like New England and many other places with towns and smaller cities stretching out over the countryside. If the people of Vegas and those on holiday don't fill the stadium, they will have to recruit the jackrabbits.That's a great idea.
90% of fandom is related to having the team be in your region, and the other 90% is probably who your dad rooted for. Moving teams around, unless your current location is a disaster, seems so destructive and so hard to rebuild. Aesthetically, they are ruining big parts of people's childhood and identity if one is a big football fan.
Kind of OT, but I think most teams would benefit from just being more inclusive with their regions like New England and Carolina do, claiming a larger region than just a city. Rocky Mountain Broncos, Michigan Lions, MidWest Colts, Rust Belt Browns, Jesus-ville Titans, etc.
| 20 | 2K |
| 19 | 485 |
| 554 | 58K |
| 1K | 31K |
| 10 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)










