Kawika Mitchell

[Iron Helmet]

I really think you should be head of BB's scouting department. He'll totaly be sold if you hand him an article talking about Mitchells contract situation. The plays and awareness he made and shown in that article, man, what a player.

Throwing insults around when opinion differs let you down though. Plus the fact you chose spaz. Putting it in capitals doesn't make it any more effective either, infact it highlights the worst put down ever.

I think he's a decent player. Would he be good for depth? At the moment he would yes, but I and I'm sure others would hope we can land and draft and develop better. Wouldn't surprise me if Belichick has him on radar since he had a decent game against us but I doubt he'd be licking his lips at the thought of Kawika Mitchell.

On that developing LB talent coming out of the draft...not much precedent there for ya, spazzola. You sure you've been following BB since he's been in NE?:bricks:

 

[Scouse Patriot]

My post bugged you huh.

Let it go, I'm a spaz..

 

[JackBauer]

Yeah. You are right. Playing behind 260 lb speed rushers is MORE CONDUCIVE to being a successful ILB than playing behind 320 lb run stuffers.

You make no sense.

What I said was playing behind the Giant's front four makes him look a lot better than he is. Call it the Reggie Torbor effect.

I suppose if the ILB's only responsibility was stuffing the run, you might have a point.

 

[Iron Helmet]

What I said was playing behind the Giant's front four makes him look a lot better than he is. Call it the Reggie Torbor effect.

I suppose if the ILB's only responsibility was stuffing the run, you might have a point.

I would say stuffing the run is the primary responsibility of an ILB.

If anything, his D line made him look WORSE. Only time it would make him look better is on blitzes.

 

[JackBauer]

I would say stuffing the run is the primary responsibility of an ILB.

If anything, his D line made him look WORSE. Only time it would make him look better is on blitzes.

How do you figure, given that he was an OLB in a 4-3?

 

[Iron Helmet]

How do you figure, given that he was an OLB in a 4-3?

Depends on which OLB position he played. However, I figure it like this:

Smaller DL = tougher to shed blocks/hold point of attack = no help for LB against run = Giants give up 4th most rushing yds per game in 2007.

 

[HEY BRO! WHAT UP?]

Bum. Product of a good D-line. Sucked in KC.