- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 73,421
- Reaction score
- 116,133
....and inside the numbers he doesn't have the quickness to keep with smaller, shiftier receivers.Rowe is not bad against number 2 or 3 receivers. He just can’t handle the number 1s.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.....and inside the numbers he doesn't have the quickness to keep with smaller, shiftier receivers.Rowe is not bad against number 2 or 3 receivers. He just can’t handle the number 1s.
4 games into his NFL career and you are saying he sucks. Nice patience with young players there.Keionta Davis could be a possibility too he's simply not good.
4 games into his NFL career and you are saying he sucks. Nice patience with young players there.
I could care less about Davis. What I do care about is providing young players every opportunity to develop and learn.Davis would easily make our PS if that make you feel better.
This is why I don’t expect much out of him this week. He’ll get a lot of snaps but I’m not sure the timing with Brady is going to be there. Thankfully, it’s the colts and not chiefs.
Indy's defense through 4 games, though not "great", has still been much better across the board than KCY's.
I think its too late for that...even for conservatives like me.Not a bad idea for him. People might actually take him seriously.
Rowe is not bad against number 2 or 3 receivers. He just can’t handle the number 1s.
I believe more in Edelman's hands than any other receiver in our team even if his last game was long time ago.Excited to see JE back.
He looks explosive and quick.
But he hasn't played in a real game in over a year.
I would expect limited snaps, maybe 2/3 of his normal workload. We need him for the long haul.
Plus we don't really need him to whip Indy.
Can't wait for Thurs.
Welcome back!!! You have been missed.
Edelman, White, Gordon, Gronk = decent weapons for Brady.
4 games into his NFL career and you are saying he sucks. Nice patience with young players there.
A little "bookkeeping" guesswork ...
Teams with players coming off 4-game suspensions are usually granted at least a 1-week practice exemption for them, a period during which they're allowed to practice with the team before being activated to the roster. With the Pats having a Thursday night game, they may even be able to get a 10-day exemption for Edelman. I'd guess that the Pats will take advantage of the exemption for at least this week.
Regardless, I think that the Pats need to activate Edelman for the Colts game by 4pm Wednesday to be able to play him on Thursday. The Pats have only today, Tuesday and Wednesday in which to "practice", and I'm guessing that only Tuesday will be more than a walkthrough or meeting/film session. That's not much of a window in which to evaluate Edelman's "game fitness", so it's still possible that he doesn't get activated this week and, thus, doesn't play Thursday night.
However, if the Pats DO activate Edelman today, that goes out the window.
The Pats don't need to make a corresponding roster move until Edelman is activated. I'm guessing that move will be one of Rowe or Hollister going to IR.
-- Rowe apparently has re-injured his groin, an issue that caused him to miss 8 games last season
-- Hollister's "chest" injury has kept him OUT the past two games. I really don't know what a "chest injury" incurred from a "hard landing" could be aside from a bruised, or even cracked, sternum. If this is that case, it could certainly be IR-worthy.
With only $1.056M in available cap space, pretty much every roster move the Pats make from here on out will have significant cap implications.
For example (if I'm figuring correctly), Edelman being on suspension for the past four weeks has saved the Pats something over $500k in cap costs. Moving Rowe to IR may save another $250k over the next 13 weeks, depending on his "injury split salary". Leaving the PSquad at 9 instead of the full 10 saves the Pats about $98k over the next 13 weeks.
Most importantly, if/when the Pats bring someone back from IR, it will reduce their current cap space.
Rowe is not bad against number 2 or 3 receivers. He just can’t handle the number 1s.
I believe more in Edelman's hands than any other receiver in our team even if his last game was long time ago.
I thought that I read or heard somewhere that the Pats' players have been surprised at how far along Edelman has come in his recovery. I hope that wasn't just a dream.
In 2013 thru 2015, Edelman's catch rate averaged 69.2%.
In the 2013 & 2014 playoffs, his catch rate averaged 68.9%.
In the 2015 post-season, his catch rate was 58.6%.
In the 2016 regular season, his catch rate was 61.6%.
In the 2016 post-season (at age 30), he averaged 58.3%, which was dragged down by a 38.5% catch rate in the SB.
In addition to recovering from an ACL, which may slow him down a bit, Edelman's catch rate(at age 32) may not be as fabulous as it once was. Tempering expectations a bit for this season, especially for the next few games, may be a prudent approach.
Recovering physical ability is one thing. Recovering game effectiveness is another level or two higher.
Huh?You can only be patient with 53 guys at once.
| 21 | 4K |
| 4 | 624 |
| 19 | 1K |
| 6 | 2K |
| 13 | 521 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 16 - May 1 (Through 26yrs)











