zippo59
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 5,082
- Reaction score
- 0
PonyExpress said:I disagree with your logic. Management doesn't have to hit a home run in every negotiation with its employees to be successful. A middle ground can be found.
I agree with this. If the Pats are able to strike a deal that is below the reported amount set by Branch and his agent then I think that would be good. It is not holdouts that are detrimental to the team as much as players with unreasonable contract expectations. If Branch got a contract that is less than the number he wanted in the beginning then it really wouldn't be sending the message that hold-outs will get a player what he wants because Branch wouldn't end up getting what he wanted.
However another part of me does agree with the idea that a team shouldn't concede a single penny to a hold-out player. I guess it is up to the team to do what they view is most beneficial because they're judgement is certainly better than mine.
Last edited: