- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 27,216
- Reaction score
- 13,467
I wouldn't be shocked if goodell says we have to review the evidence, Chass plays against the pats and then is suspendedI would be shocked if he wasn't. Dirty bugger.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I wouldn't be shocked if goodell says we have to review the evidence, Chass plays against the pats and then is suspendedI would be shocked if he wasn't. Dirty bugger.
I wouldn't be shocked if goodell says we have to review the evidence, Chass plays against the pats and then is suspended
Those are normally pretty quick processes.I'm guessing it's 50/50 as i'm assuming he'll appeal and that's another process.
In this case it should be super quick. Review any video footage, interview both players involved and any player/official/staff in close proximity. This could literally be wrapped up in a couple of hours.Those are normally pretty quick processes.
If Chase does get suspended, I bet he just serves it rather than appealing. He'll have better numbers the three weeks upcoming (probably 2 of those games with Joe Burrow) after the Patriots. That's all he's playing for this year anyway.A delay in the suspension if that results from how the league determines the suspension gets implemented is definitely the most likely outcome. How that happens, whether it comes from delaying the predetermined 'decision' because of the need to 'review evidence' or in hearing the appeal of the inevitable suspension, is the question
Depends on the timeline.Those are normally pretty quick processes.
They've got Ravens/Bills/Ravens after this game - believe it or not, Cincinnati is not dead in that division yet. And they could have Burrow back.If you go to the Bengals forums most of their fans said he did it and should be suspended. They also feel this weeks is going to be a loss no matter who plays and they think the team should give the back ups a chance to play to see what they have. Personally I would not be in any rush to bring Burrow back out to potentially get hurt again in a season that is now lost. This is another organization that needs to re-build from the ground up.
As close to death as one can get and even if they won out they need help.They've got Ravens/Bills/Ravens after this game - believe it or not, Cincinnati is not dead in that division yet. And they could have Burrow back.
If Chase does get suspended, I bet he just serves it rather than appealing. He'll have better numbers the three weeks upcoming (probably 2 of those games with Joe Burrow) after the Patriots. That's all he's playing for this year anyway.
Yeah, that's why I said 'if he's suspended'. It would be the most 345 Park Ave-ass thing ever if he just gets fined.Maybe but it may come down to something more important than what's better for his personal numbers or better for his team. What's best for Big $hield is the operative question
100% Chase would appeal and play against the PatsIf the nfl is being consistent about its policy, then yes Chase will be out Sunday . 100% clear he spit on Ramsey
Chase can push it out and make it logistically impossible for the NFL to schedule a hearing and come to a post-appeal hearing ruling before the game.
If he were suspended and appealed that lets him play Sunday - even if he loses that means he'd be out against the Ravens, not the PatsI'm guessing it's 50/50 as i'm assuming he'll appeal and that's another process.
100% Chase would appeal and play against the Pats
If that's the case then it still comes down to whether they want him for the Pats game or Ravens game. Seeing as the Ravens game is on Thanksgiving I could see him opting to be back on a primetime game rather than playing against the Patriots.What is there to appeal? You only appeal stuff you think you can get away with. There is no question to this.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











